Admin

Activity

  • invisible officer replied to the topic Loaders in the forum Bolt Action 5 years ago

    One of the topics that make real world and game crash.    The LMG loader carried the spare part and the tool bag, including the spare barrel. Bren magazines are distributed among all men carried in the amo pouches at webbing.

    PIAT projectiles are carried in a case. The PIAT loader surely had no Bren parts so could not do the LMG job fully. The mo…[Read more]

  • each nation has a generic light, medium and heavy artillery piece… which is open for people to use the models they like…

    As to the exact weapons… well in BA they are generic, rifle, SMG, LMG ect (except the BAR)… now I’ll say here I dont play french (nor does anyone in my local club!) so apart from i’ve put i’ll let other with more…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic PDF Availability Question in the forum Bolt Action 5 years ago

    The BA Campaign books are published by Ospreypublishing .com ….under osprey games on the website…

  • Hmm…. ok Forums ate my reply!…because I’d linked wikipidea in it!

    So without wiki links…

    Look at Campaign: battle of the bulge for an army list of the 1st Army but heres a list for you to start off

    consists of Officer, medics, forward observers, chaplains
    infantry: late war squads, FFI squads, Tiralleurs, morrocan Goumiers, Brigade de…[Read more]

  • I’ve consolidated the various optional rules from the 3 black powder supplements for the Napoleonics in to a single document for the guys at my local club in the UK.  Any way thought I’d put it up here to see what people think.

    Its written in a short hand as we all have the supplements, but rather than having the take them all around I thought…[Read more]

  • Master Chief replied to the topic Loaders in the forum Bolt Action 5 years ago

    Do note that the composition of the Parachute Diversion Section was changed in the latest FAQ to include one more man (although it doesn’t resolve your question):

    Page 138, Parachute Diversion Section. Composition should be: NCO and 7 men.

    The weapons configuration stated for the Parachute Diversion Section is:

    NCO and three men with rifles,…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic British 6 pounder Antitank in the forum Bolt Action 5 years ago

    decoration

    models dont get to bring their own cover

  • The sources are vague, not ever stating the type. We know that some units used plug and socket ones at same time. From 1692 we have no more invoices stating plug ones. So……

    The pike advocats died slowly, the Swiss French units using both types of bayonet and pike together until 1703.

     

    Many went again for swine feathers, so Russia in 1704.…[Read more]

  • George replied to the topic Plug Bayonets Question in the forum Black Powder 5 years ago

    That’s correct. Plug bayonets had there handle ends shoved up the gun barrels with the blades sticking out so they were hard to dislodge once inserted. Hurt the English when fighting the Scots at the battle of Killiecrankie. The Scots got up close to the English. The English tried to insert their plug bayonets but couldn’t get them inserted in…[Read more]

  • Garry Wills replied to the topic Plug Bayonets Question in the forum Black Powder 5 years ago

    IO – I know nothing about this thread but I am interested in clarifying the posts. George said that the French introduced socket bayonets in 1703, are you saying that the socket bayonet was introduced earlier in France? Secondly LAOK has plug bayonets as being not removable in action, is this backed up by the literature?

    Thanks

    Garry

    Garry

  • Well, 1703 is a bit late for French introduction.

    Vauban had advocated a plug bayonet as early as 1669 and the first French line infantry regiments got it 1689. The Fusiliers du Roi had no pikes since creation 1672, being armed with flintlocks as artillery guards. No burning matches for a unit that guarded the artillery  Boooom…….

    But the…[Read more]

  • Hi George – I think that only the admins can delete posts.  It was a great question and I’m sure the answer will be useful for others in the future so probably worth letting it stand.

  • Hi Lewis,

    When the lists mention “Skirmishers” in the special rules they mean that this unit is in a Skirmish formation and all of the rules for Skirmishers therefore apply.  This is a bit different to the items in the ‘useful rules’ section (see p100). The Skirmish rules are quite fundamental, and rules are spread through the book.  We are lucky…[Read more]

  • George replied to the topic Plug Bayonets Question in the forum Black Powder 5 years ago

    Never mind. found the answer to my question. French started to use them in 1703 and British used them under Marlborough. Now if I can only figure out how to delete my own post?

  • George started the topic Plug Bayonets Question in the forum Black Powder 5 years ago

    Hello,

    Question, I’m looking at the rules in Last Argument of Kings for plug bayonets. I understand that in the War of the Spanish Succession (which I’m building my army for) used socket bayonets? Were they introduced before or during this war? Would the plug bayonet rules work for this conflict or for earlier wars of the late 17th century? Please advise

  • Nat replied to the topic The Impossible Conundrum in the forum Bolt Action 5 years ago

    Zaitsevs rules win… they are a definite 2+ irrespective of anything else… he ‘wounds’ vehicles on a 2+.  Kieffers rules say that instead of a 5+ you need a 6+

    So Kieffer changes the wound chart from 5+ to 6+, then Zaitesev changes it 2+ as he doesnt care about the starting value…. OR Zaitsev changes it from a 5+ to a 2+ then Kieffer CANT…[Read more]

  • <p style=”text-align: left;”>This will never happen (different theater, allies, etc), but what happens when Vasily meets Kieffer?</p>
    Vasily Zaitsev (Ostfront book):

    Kill-shot: Zaitsev’s uncanny ability means that any shot he takes
    against infantry, artillery and soft skin vehicles will inflict damage
    on a roll of 2+ regardless of the ta…[Read more]

  • SteveT started the topic Not good in the forum Beyond the Gates of Antares 5 years ago

    Played our first game today. Was not good at all.  Points system is bizarrely unbalanced, way too many fiddly random modifiers and non-random modifiers. Assaults rules are far too unwieldy.

    Wish it had the elegant simplicity of Bolt Action that effectively conquers all these things with less mental processing.

    I came, I saw, I said “No”.

  • Lacking any other special rules/restrictions, I would suggest manhandling as for a light howitzer (6″ on a ‘Run’ order).

    Yes sounds logical. I am thinking of getting the US T66, 5 more points for 1 more man compared to the Land Mattress. It can be printed from this file:

    https://www.wargaming3d.com/product/american-t66-114mm-4-5-rocket-launcher/

  • Very nice indeed.

  • Load More