Not good

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #183790
    SteveT
    Participant

    Played our first game today. Was not good at all.  Points system is bizarrely unbalanced, way too many fiddly random modifiers and non-random modifiers. Assaults rules are far too unwieldy.

    Wish it had the elegant simplicity of Bolt Action that effectively conquers all these things with less mental processing.

    I came, I saw, I said “No”.

    #183794
    Luiso Bosqueviejo
    Participant

    Well, not all games are for all people.

    What a pity, I think it is one of the best tabletop wargames I ever played. It has a great, elegant, narrative-driven rules system with echoes from all the things I love of the old-style GW games (80s and early 90s), but with a modern and very innovate system.

    It may seem a bit complicated at first, but trust me, the road is well worth it.

    There is a very growing community, if you need help or any advice with your first games, I’m sure you will receive a very warm welcome!

    Best.

    #183884
    Zac
    Participant

    Played our first game today. Was not good at all.  Points system is bizarrely unbalanced, way too many fiddly random modifiers and non-random modifiers. Assaults rules are far too unwieldy.

    The system is a touch disorganised. It is a more complex system than Bolt Action since it adds a lot more tech, weapons and armour. It does take a bit of work to get the rules sorted out but I think it is worth the effort since it is a fun system.

    What part of the points system did you think was unbalanced?

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.