George

Activity

  • Transport units are a unit and therefore ALL the normal deployment rules apply.

    – So yes they can be deployed either on the table or in Reserve as you see fit.
    -They provide an order die… the only die NOT placed in the bag for deploying are those that have forward deployment so they must be placed in the bag….

    when you say they cant do…[Read more]

  • well….. this is where BA fall apart… its NOT a tight competitive system, but rather a framework (why multiple campaign books played against each other can break the system)…

    So basically theres two approaches… one is its a friendly game, and if thats historical & you pay the points then use it!  (this is what I would go with)
    the other…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic Napoleonic Bavarians in the forum Black Powder 5 months, 4 weeks ago

    eg Rheinbund are moral 5 with rifle mixed in the unit entries

    the Westphilian Cuirassiers lose 1 H2H & the Guard du Corp 2 H2H between the unit entries and the stat charts.

  • Nat replied to the topic Napoleonic Bavarians in the forum Black Powder 5 months, 4 weeks ago

    Theres all sorts of miss-prints in that book between the army entries and the stat -charts at the end of the book… missing rules, missing /incorrect stats etc etc

    The book is AT BEST a frame work starting point for you & your mates to work off…..

    However historically Bavarian Cheveaux Leger were equipped the same as most other french…[Read more]

  • invisible officer replied to the topic Penetration in the forum Bolt Action 6 months ago

    In real life there had been splinter rings to fix to the Panzerfaust head.  So it could be used like an HE grenade too.     The PIAT was even better for that role. With no backblast safe to use in rooms or trenches.

  • They would count as charging because of the Sweeping Advance . As you have said, a unit cannot engage an enemy unless it has charged, but when contact is made, you split the combat up into smaller ones. A supporting unit counts as engaged, so will count as charging.

  • I would say that the support would count as a victorious not. It may not have fought directly, but it still fought in that last combat.

     

    As to the second question, I answered a similar question on the Facebook group, or rather, I reminded the players of the disorder test for the sweeping advance, when it was pointed out to me that it was not in…[Read more]

  • I like the house rule of … if down then they’re not in the way as they are on the ground trying not to be hit
    If they are in the way (model height + 1″ as per normal) and the roll to hit fails by 1 (ie soft cover mod) then that counts as a hit against the unit in the way :p

     

  • Big Al replied to the topic Counting units in the forum Hail Caesar 6 months, 3 weeks ago

    Well, ideally four or five divisions is what you need. But as I said, you are learning the rules and made the mistake has been learned. Next time you won’t count the skirmishers. I only said “it’s your game” because of that. I was not saying that you should do what you want because of that, only that it would not matter because of your learnin…[Read more]

  • Big Al replied to the topic Counting units in the forum Hail Caesar 6 months, 4 weeks ago

    Not really. It is your game and you made the decision for both sides. I know you could argue that one side might have won if skirmishers hadn’t been counted, but the important thing is that you had fun and learned the rules.
    next time you play, you’ll not count the skirmishers and probably find it would make little difference with small for…[Read more]

  • invisible officer replied to the topic War wagons in the forum Hail Caesar 7 months ago

    The temple of Ramses III relief show the carts  drawn by more than two oxen (= Slow) and with just one axle in mid of base (= unstable)  They seem to be ordinary trasport, carrying the belongimgs and kids. So more like a modern camper, not an APC.

     

    Instead of adding power to a force they would seperate the fighters into the “crews” of a few p…[Read more]

  • Big Al replied to the topic War wagons in the forum Hail Caesar 7 months ago

    Count them as ordinary infantry types (spears or archers) as if in square. This means that they ignore all break test results except “unit breaks.” A square is limited in the way it moves. Normally, it cannot advance, but can retire, but as this is a wagon, I would suggest that it moves slowly and cannot charge.

  • @lawrence well you’ve got a couple of issues…

    1 – game balance, LMGs went up to RoF 4 in v2 because they werent in use
    2 – time frame – the RoF is not actual but game balance slant on effectiveness
    3- Role – just because something isnt a X weapon in the view of modern eyes doesnt mean it wasnt used in that role… examples would be the MG43 or…[Read more]

  • Its still in beta, but aside from the fact that ALL types of soviet comissars disapeared last update is pretty much there.

    Actually …. scrub that… cant use it today – no abilty to select a nation to create a list!

  • The answer to that is very nebulus…

    Its down to the TO…thats the bottom line of Tournaments.

    Its their choice to what books they allow… they can over-ride the FAQ, and often do limiting armies to units from X books… Some will make allowances for a specifc army ie theirs a tournament near me that will only allow armies of books, but allow…[Read more]

  • Guts & Glory is the BP Epic …

    its two small (single re-enforced brigade) sides… OR 1 moderate force

  • The real observer was an expert. Specially trained and normally doing nothing else. A spotter was just an ordinary man that had a base training in gun spotting. Every officer and NCO had that ability in the big armies.   So the different rules are historically correct.

     

    But  armies tended to misuse specialists. But mostly in desperate si…[Read more]

  • The name of its entry in the Japanese forces book is something of a giveaway.

    “TYPE 97 CHI-HA MEDIUM TANK”. :p

    It mostly seems to be a criterion of which slot it gets put in armour lists, and/or how it was used, and yes, the bizarrely named “damage value”.

    Tank size occasionally crops up in some rules: like a tank ramming a building, or (fr…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic Wakeless in the forum Victory At Sea 8 months, 2 weeks ago

    Wakeless rule is to show that the torpedo makes very little to no visable effect on the surface when traveling through the water…. note even when firing a wakeless torpedo from a submarine you still have the air bubble raising to the surface which in standard weather are visable.

    Evade Order means that the ship is braced for sudden violent…[Read more]

  • You do have the equipment card, bomb shackles, for fighters….

  • Load More