Activity
-
Nat replied to the topic Stalingrad Enemy at the Gates in the forum Bolt Action 6 years ago
Yeah it was one of the changes to the red army after the winter war with Finland in 39/40 (the formation of SMG equipped companies…. cant remember if they were their own battalions or just a company within the normal battalion structure… its also where the first tank rider units came from.. but thats another topic :p)
The soviet book does…[Read more]
-
SteveT replied to the topic Three flankers… in the forum Hail Caesar 6 years ago
Yes Al, thanks , some very useful pointers there.
I should have added a diagram to better illustrate the situation.
[Persian Cav] [Macedonians]
[Persian Infantry] [Persian Infantry] [Persian Infantry]
So the Macedonians and Persian Infantry are all already engaged. 2 Persian Inf are in support
Next turn the Pers…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Napoleonic French New Player Questions in the forum Black Powder 6 years ago
Now to be fair they wheren’t supposed to have kept the bearskins….just like the Voltiguers shouldnt have kept their swords or the 2nd, 3rd etc battalions their egales….
oops….
:p
-
Nat replied to the topic Yak-1 or Yak -1b in the forum Blood Red Skies 6 years, 1 month ago
If you go to the facebook group – ‘Blood Red Skies Ready Room’ and look in the files section there is a FAQ file (latest is March this year) by Andy Chambers (the Author of the game)…
however the errata section (so points change on the P51, the Yak1 & something else) has gone missing … again! but there is a file from about a year ago with…[Read more]
-
Koin-Koin replied to the topic Thread Approval in the forum General Discussion 6 years, 1 month ago
Hi Craig,
Thanks for considering me as a candidate but I’m not sure I’m the right person for this.
I’d like to provide some help here but the moderator thing as I understand it seems quite serious and may be a bit over the kind of involvement I can handle.
If you think I can be of any help and elaborate a bit what you expect from me, I’ll give…[Read more]
-
SteveT started the topic Three flankers… in the forum Hail Caesar 6 years, 1 month ago
Had this situation earlier.
One Macedonian unit, facing off against a line of 3 Persian units. (So 1 supporting left and 1 supporting right)
A Persian Light Horse was somewhere to the left flank of the Macedonians, not engaged.
The rules say only 1 support per flank allowed.
I believe as the Persians were not starting the turn fully BEHIND…[Read more]
-
Koin-Koin replied to the topic Koin-Koin's little planes in the forum Blood Red Skies 6 years, 1 month ago
Those Corsairs should have been done a long time ago.
-
George started the topic Painted my first unit of cavalry in the forum General Discussion 6 years, 1 month ago
D’Arco’s Cuirassiers are ready for battle! I know many of you are professionals and my work is amateur. Still, I’m feeling pretty good about these.
Also, I created a blog for miniature wargaming as I get into it. Made 4 posts already.
-
Nat replied to the topic Stalingrad Enemy at the Gates in the forum Bolt Action 6 years, 1 month ago
soviets are easier because even in 1941 they have whole units armed with SMGs… its just that if you wanted to make 3 units of rifle armed guys from a box you cant….(oh dear what I shame out of 2 boxes of guys I now have 2 units of SMG guys)
But yeah..with Bolt Action take the rules as a starting point and common ground for playing people..…[Read more]
-
Carsten replied to the topic Stalingrad Enemy at the Gates in the forum Bolt Action 6 years, 1 month ago
Thanks for the answers 🙂
As i only play personal for fun and have no ambition to play at tournaments i think i can do it whatever i want 🙂
But you frightened me a bit. I have not controlled if the weapons for soviets are enough 😉 But i will build them soon….
-
Nat replied to the topic Stalingrad Enemy at the Gates in the forum Bolt Action 6 years, 1 month ago
1. You can use the emplacements as terrain peices or as basing materials… which ever takes your fancy.. there is no right or wrong answer
2. Yeah you dont always get enough of the weapons you want in the boxs… for example the Soviet Infantry box doesnt give enough rifles… so if you can either use them then count as normal rifles when…[Read more]
-
Carsten started the topic Stalingrad Enemy at the Gates in the forum Bolt Action 6 years, 1 month ago
Hello all!
I am a new Bolt Action Player. I have the Starter Set and have read into the rules. So far all is fine. I also have bought the Stalingrad Deluxe Battle Set. Here i have a question and two comments:
1. In the battle set every side has a mortar team and a mmg team. There are also two Sandbag emplacements. Are these for the mortar or for…[Read more]
-
Carsten became a registered member 6 years, 1 month ago
-
Steeljackal replied to the topic Clearing Obstacles using Explosives in the forum Bolt Action 6 years, 1 month ago
Poorly written rules, many repetitions, conflicting rules 🤷♂️
To avoid disputes, I would follow a rough reading of the rules. So the Russians follow their “Demolition Charges” rule and the Americans their “explosives” rule:
Americans can put explosives on obstacles and buildings.
Having said that by agreeing between players, the rules can be…[Read more] -
Steeljackal replied to the topic Multi-shot weapons in assault in the forum Bolt Action 6 years, 1 month ago
I agree with Masterchief.
N.1 damage roll per model.
Tough fighters or weapons with a special “assault” rule that succeeded on the damage roll, reroll a second time. -
Steeljackal replied to the topic Tank and turret pivots in the forum Bolt Action 6 years, 1 month ago
If you’re talking about moving for purpose of making indirect fire ranging reset, I’d say that a hull/chassis pivot in place would not count, nor would simply turning a turret. The key term being “in place”.
I just add how the movement must be done to reset the indirect shot adjustment. From rulenook “…to count as ‘moved’,…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Multi-shot weapons in assault in the forum Bolt Action 6 years, 1 month ago
Bolt Action 2nd Edition page 79:
The attackers make one assault attack per man (keep in mind that some weapons and special rules confer additional attacks). As there is no taking cover from a grenade blast, bayonet thrust or point-blank shot, all close quarter attacks against other infantry or artillery crews hit automatically. Roll to inflict…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Clearing Obstacles using Explosives in the forum Bolt Action 6 years, 1 month ago
Stalingrad book Page 133:
DEMOLITION CHARGES
New option for Pioneer and Assault Engineer Units.
New Options – One man may be equipped with Demolition Charges in addition to his other weapons at a cost of +5 ptsSpecial Rules
– Demolition Charges: Once per game, an engineer unit may use a Down order to place a demolition
charge token at any…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic Leaving the Board in the forum Black Seas 6 years, 1 month ago
Make it that you take damage if you leave..the same as if you are becalmed or drop 2 sails levels.
another alternative is to allow the following ship(s) to target the one that has left the table…measuring to the exit point. The ship that left can’t fire back as all the crew are attempting to tack the ship round
-
Nat replied to the topic Are the Warlord VAS the same ans the Mongoose version ? in the forum Victory At Sea 6 years, 1 month ago
I’m guessing December for release of the rulebook going off the release date of the convoy pack
- Load More
