Activity
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Jagdpanther vs Tiger 1 in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 11 months ago
Hmmm, a single Jagdpanther is against nature. 😉
Merkblatt 75a/20 from 14.6.44 stated that the use of single Jagdpanther was forbidden. The minimum unit was four.
In attacks it was to bind enemy tanks from front to allow Panzer attacks from the flank.
“Fester Einbau von Jagdpanthern in die HKL. ist verboten.” ~Â Use in front line in f…[Read more]
-
Steeljackal replied to the topic Jagdpanther vs Tiger 1 in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 11 months ago
It is the same with StugIV and Panzer IV, but:
1) At the time, in reality, turretless tanks had the advantage of costing less to produce, but in the game it is not reproduced correctly with the point cost.
2) On the other hand, the turretless tanks had the advantage of having a low profile, and being more difficult to hit. If you see vintage…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Jagdpanther vs Tiger 1 in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 11 months ago
And the option to fire a coaxial MMG to go with it 🤔
-
SteveT started the topic Jagdpanther vs Tiger 1 in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 11 months ago
Jagdpanther vs Tiger 1: What am I missing?
Costs are 390, and 395.  So just for the extra 5 point  you get a turreted version of the same gun.
Feels like I’ve missed an Errata about it or something
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Passenger oddness in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 11 months ago
Hmm, one might argue that he lacks the protection from others serving as splinter catchers, 😉
My father used to tell me that as forward observer he never hitched a ride in a German SPW-  (His battery was in an ID, serving along Pz Div. )  he named them rolling  death traps. He saw too many men burned to death in the wrecks. Open top was n…[Read more]
-
SteveT replied to the topic Passenger oddness in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 11 months ago
It is even more illogical ,in a sense, as men packed into a confined space should lose relatively more to their transport exploding. A solo Captain going along for the ride should have less chance of dying not more.
-
SteveT replied to the topic Passenger oddness in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 11 months ago
Yes exactly, hence my example (B) which took  1d6 on each of 3 units:  2 of were solo leaders and would be pulverised! Seems very odd. Going for a  house rule of 1d6 hits on the passengers determined randomly.
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Passenger oddness in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 11 months ago
When a transport vehicle is destroyed, the number of hits is equal to the total number of figures being transported.
Interesting house rule, it is “fairer” in the sense that every transported soldier gets one hit (and the rest is up to whether he geta killed). The existing rule penalises small units with fewer than 6 men and favours units with…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Passenger oddness in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 11 months ago
Bolt Action 2nd Ed page 116:
If a transport vehicle is destroyed, each unit onboard suffers D6 hits – roll this number of hits against each unit, apply damage and remove casualties as normal.
I think the intention is for each unit to suffer D6 hits. It might have been better to say roll D6 and apply the result to all passenger units onboard,…[Read more]
-
SteveT started the topic Passenger oddness in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 11 months ago
(A) Halftrack containing 1 small squad
(B) Halftrack containing 2 leaders and an AT-Rifle Team
Both are destroyed.
Passengers in (A) take dd6 hits…1d6 in total.
Passengers in (B) take dd6 hits each….3d6 in total.
Seems odd to me.
-
Charge The Guns replied to the topic Rules Question Thread in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 11 months ago
Hi Wayne – Don’t worry, this is something that confuses many people initially, so you are not alone! The only important thing is that the frontages of a regular sized unit in each army is roughly equal. Many people use 20mm or 15mm frontage per figure, and have battalions of around 24 figures, arranged so that in line that are 12 figures wide a…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic In and out in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 11 months ago
Actually that was under the “ORDERS TO TROOPS INSIDE BUILDINGS” section that started on page 122. So a Run Order can be issued to a unit to leave the building, and if the unit can also reach another building across the street (with at least one model at an opening into the building), it should be able to enter it.
-
SteveT replied to the topic In and out in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 11 months ago
Hm. But that is really talking about adjoining buildings. Not running across a street into a new one. Right?
-
Master Chief replied to the topic In and out in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 11 months ago
Bolt Actikn 2nd Ed page 123 top left paragraph:
A Run order can be used to either leave the building, to move up or down two floors, to move up to two adjoining buildings, or to make an assault into an adjoining floor or
building. A running unit cannot also shoot – as per the usual rule. Note that some buildings have a flat roof which is a…[Read more] -
SteveT started the topic In and out in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 11 months ago
This question arose yesterday.
Can an infantry unit leave a building and enter a different building (say across the street) in a single Run order?
Cheers
-
Nat replied to the topic Submarine operations in Cruel Seas in the forum Cruel Seas 5 years, 11 months ago
MTBs /small boats will have been used to slip under radar to mine channels used by subs and also to clear an area before you sail your own subs / capital ships out of harbour.
Could you do dieppe… possibly… but I wouldnt due to the numbers involved… but the Commando raids (such as the recover of the paras who took apart the german radar…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Submarine operations in Cruel Seas in the forum Cruel Seas 5 years, 11 months ago
MTB and Schnellboote had DC / Wasserbomben. They used them mainly to attack surface vessels, running close along . throwing them and going away full Speed. The blast broke the Targets back.
They also used them in fleeing before destroyers and similar. Not nice to run over a DC….. .
Submarine hunting was rarely done. The boats had limited…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Azad hind or also known as indian legion in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 11 months ago
Warlord’s German historian was not asked about IR 950, the Azad Hind. So I doubt that it will be included in the next Normandie book.
The unit was organised from may 44 on like a German Standard infantry unit. Serving mostly as occupation force and retreating post Invasion it had few Engagements. It was never trusted , there had been…[Read more]
-
Koin-Koin replied to the topic Lets see those planes! (Beware 512KB photo size limit) in the forum Blood Red Skies 5 years, 11 months ago
Nice Yak and Lavochkin indeed.
Please tell me that the tiger claws are decals.
-
Charge The Guns replied to the topic Commander MacColla Unit and Disorder in the forum Pike & Shotte 5 years, 11 months ago
My pleasure, 👍
- Load More
