Activity
-
SteveT replied to the topic Scenario 5 – Kampfgruppe Peiper in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 7 months ago
Yes, but who gets which side? Dice for it?
Cheers
-
SteveT started the topic Scenario 5 – Kampfgruppe Peiper in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 7 months ago
Battle Bulge scenario. Does anyone know which side the US is supposed to come in on?
Cheers
-
Nat replied to the topic VaS Rules release in the forum Victory At Sea 5 years, 7 months ago
What I’ve heard is that the release will be 3 books
1, The rules
2, Scenarios
3, Ship stats
So whilst they wont release the cards on their own you will be able to get the stats without buying the ships and make up your own cards (which in fairness I think I might end up doing some as I’m not a great fan of way Cruel Seas /Victory at Sea/ Black…[Read more]
-
SteveT replied to the topic Beginning to build my forces in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 7 months ago
Vehicles
I only paint separate pieces if they are going to end up enclosed such as inside a truck cabin; the sort of places that you can’t jab a brush in later.
Otherwise if you paint separate bits you are making extra work for yourself and so many surfaces end up not being visible anyway, something hard to judge until you make it.
More i…[Read more]
-
Big Al replied to the topic Skirmisher and Troops in Open Order and charging/being charged in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 7 months ago
Forgive me, but I have been in Black Powder mode, which is why I gave the answer I did earlier.
In Black Powder, when infantry form square as a reaction to a cavalry charge, the cavalry may then use the remainder of their movement to move back or away from the square. So, I would agree with your suggestion, or even use any excess movement to move…[Read more]
-
Big Al replied to the topic Skirmisher and Troops in Open Order and charging/being charged in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 7 months ago
Ah! Good point. I missed that bit. Well then, as skirmishers can’t charge a formed unit, they will just stop. Actually, it is a tactic that would force a line unit back into line, making it vulnerable to other forms of attack. For example, you declare the charge by the skirmishers and the line closes ranks, it can’t then form square against a cav…[Read more]
-
Big Al replied to the topic Mixed Formations – when to use? in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 7 months ago
Hi Nat,
Yes, that’s right. When shooting it from the front, you count it as skirmishers for targeting, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that you are hitting the skirmishers. You are hitting the unit, as you have said, so it gets all the benefits of the formation.
-
Nat replied to the topic Mixed Formations – when to use? in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 7 months ago
@marecki – I read it differently… as the shooting rules state that it’s is an assault column or line when being shot at in the flank or rear I take it that mixed formation IS as an upgrade so should keep the +1 moral
the only reason why I wouldn’t give the screen the sharpshooter rule is because the unit as a whole doesn’t have it
-
Big Al replied to the topic Skirmisher and Troops in Open Order and charging/being charged in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 7 months ago
The light infantry can’t close up. If the skirmishers charge into contact, the light infantry don’t have close ranks as a charge reaction option, so it is never going to happen.
When they are in combat, they form a loose line and fight in Open Order.
-
Nat replied to the topic Battle for the Pacific – Questions in the forum Victory At Sea 5 years, 7 months ago
New question DP and restricted… both half the AD now does this mean you only have a quarter of your AD? Or does the Count as AA part of DP give you a 360 arc for the purpose of the restricted rule?
-
Nat replied to the topic VaS Rules release in the forum Victory At Sea 5 years, 7 months ago
Nothing has been said yet …..as there are pre order stuff up for Oct my personal guess is an Xmas release
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Prepping Minis in the forum General Discussion 5 years, 7 months ago
I do it ever on resin stuff, that has often such a coat.
But metal miniatures are today rarely coated with such a stuff. In some 40 years I hardly met 10 miniatures that made any problems. And plastics have no such coating at all.
If they have a coating problem it comes from the modeller that played around with the miniatures on sprue or…[Read more]
-
Big Al replied to the topic Napoleonic Artillery in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 7 months ago
Sorry guys, you are right. Shaken units can advance, they just cannot charge. My mistake!
-
Nat replied to the topic Napoleonic Artillery in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 7 months ago
@Big Al – that page number tells me shaken units cant charge, not that shaken units cant advance towards the enemy… I dont see how they are the same thing? And as SteveT says its quite a difference.
Advance towards the enemy = make a move and end up closer to the enemy than they where before they moved…
charge = move in to hand to hand…[Read more]
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Napoleonic Artillery in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 7 months ago
There is a big difference between shaken units not being allowed to charge and not being allowed to advance on the enemy. I am very surprised Big Al you are usually more precise than this. As to my previous post I was reacting to your comment that ‘the rules only specify that one gun is one gun’, which is clearly no longer true.
All the…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Napoleonic Artillery in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 7 months ago
BP is a very flexible minded system. If you want a single model to represent a battery, do it. Or try some ways. My Napoleonic forces have 1 model batteries, my Crimean war forces a 1 model ~ 2 real gun system. Allowing to show the different numbers of guns n batteries.
The front of a battery was wide, the guns not standing wheel by wheel. Th…[Read more]
-
Big Al replied to the topic Napoleonic Artillery in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 7 months ago
Edited my last post with page numbers.
-
Big Al replied to the topic Napoleonic Artillery in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 7 months ago
Look for it under Shaken!
-
SteveT replied to the topic Napoleonic Artillery in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 7 months ago
The thing I found curious was Big Al saying “a unit that is shaken cannot advance on the enemy”. I’ve looked for that under shooting and hand combat. Can’t find it. It’s a game changer. I can find “shaken can’t charge” is all.
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Napoleonic Artillery in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 7 months ago
Sorry big Al, but one of the improvements in BP2 is that they addressed this issue. On p.17 the rules discuss using two or three guns in a unit rather than one. The unit is described as a battery and given the frontage of a small infantry or cavalry unit, 120-150mm. How many real guns is represented by the unit is left open. However the gun sc…[Read more]
- Load More
