Activity
-
SteveT started the topic Terrain Effects in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 6 months ago
I am surprised by the Black Powder/Hail/Pike series in that terrain seems only to affect movement and shooting.
Not seen anywhere that it affects, say, a heavy formed unit, being more easily taken down by lights in rough terrain?Perhaps I am missing something
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Recommended Vallejo Paints? in the forum Victory At Sea 5 years, 6 months ago
The best Book is: Die Anstriche und Taarnanstriche der Kriegsmarine by Dieter Jung and others. There you find the corresponding German Marine names from the list linked by you and heaps of originally photos. Captions are in English too.
I met the authours often, they had been the best experts in Germany. Some are dead now, shows how old I…[Read more]
-
Big Al replied to the topic Does this unit fight twice? in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 6 months ago
Don’t apologise. That is the purpose of this forum.
In your situation, yes the victorious unit can support the following combat.
This is why you choose the order that the combats are resolved. What a victorious unit does is entirely up to you. The only exception would be certain Special rules, for example Fanatics, who would have to follow up o…[Read more]
-
Big Al replied to the topic Skirmishers – what can they do? in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 6 months ago
Not a lot, really. Depending on who charged who, they could have been moved to support in combat if it was the red unit that charged. Now, they’ll just have to sit and wait. Once the combat ends, they are in a position to shoot at the enemy.
-
SteveT started the topic Does this unit fight twice? in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 6 months ago
On my image, I have a pair of units attacking an enemy pair. One enemy has to give ground. The winner doesn’t follow them.
So now we have 1 unit with friend (the winner of the first fight) on its flank vs 1 enemy. Does the friend get to support this new fight?
Sorry for bombard of questions, hoping these help others too.
-
SteveT started the topic Skirmishers – what can they do? in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 6 months ago
Unit of skirmishes, red on my image, looking at friend infantry in combat with enemy infantry (see pic).
What can they do? Not allowed to charge at formed or shoot into combat..
-
Nat replied to the topic Smoke Template Size? in the forum Victory At Sea 5 years, 6 months ago
its 3″ in length
-
SteveT started the topic Large units – worth it? in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 6 months ago
I can see their large fighting values are excellent 1 on 1. But don’t you open yourself up to being attacked by 2 regular sized units on the front flank? From what I have seen, 2 regulars ‘outgun’ a large.
Any input welcome!
-
invisible officer replied to the topic MMGs On German Transport Trucks in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 6 months ago
The German 1944 Kraftfahr Zug / Platoon 30 ton had 10 Lorries with 10 Drivers and no co Driver. Zugführer in light car with a Driver and a Kradmelder with a motorbike.
For these 10 lorries and staff 2 LMG are assigned. The Zugführer had a pistol, all others a K 98. The MG had no special fixing point on the 3 ton Lorry. Under air attack the…[Read more]
-
Big Al replied to the topic Unit counts in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 6 months ago
No. A unit is a unit. Size doesn’t matter where break point is concerned.
to be fair, most tiny and a lot of small units are skirmishers anyway and as such don’t count towards the break point!
The notes at the top of each army list States the parameters.
-
SteveT started the topic Unit counts in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 6 months ago
Unit counts occur when building army lists and determining break points.
But what do you do about Small/Tiny/Large units? 2 smalls make 1 regular?
Cheers
-
SteveT replied to the topic Small unit frontages in the forum Pike & Shotte 5 years, 6 months ago
I see. Thank you.
Would be doing ECWs.
-
SteveT replied to the topic Small unit frontages in the forum Pike & Shotte 5 years, 6 months ago
So you are playing Small = frontage of half a large.
I was think Small should be half a regular. Otherwise if two smalls contact a regular on the same flank, wouldn’t they end up looking a bit odd? Or does it not matter?
Taking it to silly extremes, if you had a great big line of regular size units and a long line of small units, then these…[Read more]
-
SteveT replied to the topic MMGs On German Transport Trucks in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 6 months ago

-
invisible officer replied to the topic Napoleonic French New Player Questions in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 6 months ago
They had rules. But often ignored them. By intent, more often from Need.
Lucien Rousselot is a must and if you take the time to read it in deep it will help a lot. How it should have been. 😉
At Waterloo a lot of very old stuff was still / again worn. The battlefield finds show old styles of Buttons. In line and even guard units there was a…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Stalingrad Enemy at the Gates in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 6 months ago
About the Soviet infanty (not just SMG) companies….lets be honest with something like 8 rifle battalion org changes (including 3 guard changes) between April 41 and May 45 its no wonder people get confused as to when and how they where formed :p
I mean it reads like some units could well have ‘skipped’ an org change because it happened so f…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Stalingrad Enemy at the Gates in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 6 months ago
Marder III is a small designation problem. The first prototype of Panzerjäger 38″ (Sd. Kfz. 139) with 7,62 cm . Only 27 Feb. 1944 it became Marder III by order of Hitler. Until October 42 344 are made. 176 of them on 38 G base.
In November 42 building was changed to the “true” Marder III with German 7,5 cm. In that month the base was cha…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Stalingrad Enemy at the Gates in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 6 months ago
Yeah it was one of the changes to the red army after the winter war with Finland in 39/40 (the formation of SMG equipped companies…. cant remember if they were their own battalions or just a company within the normal battalion structure… its also where the first tank rider units came from.. but thats another topic :p)
The soviet book does…[Read more]
-
Big Al replied to the topic Three flankers… in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 6 months ago
Right. Having now seen the diagram, the light cavalry would require a two move order to charge the Macedonian flank. Once it has charged, everything I said earlier happens.
Regarding supporting units – The flank rule that you have asked about is something that you have misunderstood. When the rule talks about how many supports can be on each…[Read more]
-
SteveT replied to the topic Three flankers… in the forum Hail Caesar 5 years, 6 months ago
Yes Al, thanks , some very useful pointers there.
I should have added a diagram to better illustrate the situation.
[Persian Cav] [Macedonians]
[Persian Infantry] [Persian Infantry] [Persian Infantry]
So the Macedonians and Persian Infantry are all already engaged. 2 Persian Inf are in support
Next turn the Pers…[Read more]
- Load More
