Activity
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Bazooka/Panzerschrek vs infantry units? in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 9 months ago
You do a common mistake. There was not just one Rifle grenade type. Wehrmacht even had a propaganda amo to send printed propaganda stuff to Allied trenches.
The German AT Rifle Grenade was not the same as the HE anti infantry Rifle Grenade. It was a shaped charge amo. The Raketen Panzer Büchse / Panzerschreck amo was not just an enl…[Read more]
-
George started the topic The New Epic Battles Sounds Exciting in the forum General Discussion 5 years, 9 months ago
I checked out the new American Civil War series for Epic Battles. I hope that Warlord Games will do the same for other eras (American Revolution, Seven Years War, War of Spanish Succession, etc…) Also, is there a new set of rules for the Epic battles? Or are Black Powder rules being used just at smaller scales so that larger campaigns can be fought?
-
invisible officer replied to the topic New civil war announcment in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 9 months ago
Another example of the “strange scales” politics of Warlord. Like with the ships old gamers (like me) have allready “some” armies. In ACW I have large 1/300 forces and also some regiments in 28mm. My need for 13,5 mm is ………..
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Bazooka/Panzerschrek vs infantry units? in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 9 months ago
The one man killed rule is OK for most of these weapons.
Panzerfaust 150 had in 45 an optional “Splitterring” that produced a rain of splinters but most had nothing like that. But the shaped charge effect produced splinters from stones and concrete so it was not nice to be in the area……….
-
Charge The Guns replied to the topic New civil war announcment in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 9 months ago
As Big Al says, they are officially 13.5 mm. I have see some comparisons online which show them matching with Kallistra 12mm figs.
I don’t think they are intended to ‘mix’. I think they are intended to be their own size. Once you get below the 15mm size I find mixing figures between ranges very tricky and rarely bother trying.
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Battalion Squares and Attack Columns in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 9 months ago
To say that battalion squares are not used at all in 1700 would be wrong. For example the Bavarian regulations of 1680 has squares of different sizes, from brigade down to battalion. Funny thing, it was oval, not square.
Solid squares are often found in 18th century and some hollow ones are trained too. The movement by tactical “divisions”…[Read more]
-
Charge The Guns replied to the topic Unboxing the Infantry of the Sun King in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 9 months ago
Interesting to see what you get in the box – thanks for sharing the video.
-
Charge The Guns replied to the topic Varnishing in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 9 months ago
Hi George. I have never tried this, but I imagine the approach suggested is to print your own ‘transfer’, at the appropriate size, and apply. I think the varnish comes in as part of the transfer process. I believe that before applying transfers it is recommended to gloss varnish the painted model, then once the varnish is dry, it is easier…[Read more]
-
George started the topic Unboxing the Infantry of the Sun King in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 9 months ago
Hello,
In this blog post I open up a box of Sun King infantry and talk about it.
https://thetinsoldierguy.blogspot.com/2020/12/unboxing-infantry-of-sun-king.html
Enjoy and feel free to critique (politely of course).
-
George started the topic Washing the sprues in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 9 months ago
The link is to my blog post where I have a video where I wash the sprues to the unit I’m about to paint.
https://thetinsoldierguy.blogspot.com/2020/12/washing-sprues.html
Enjoy and feel free to critique. I’m an amature still learning.
-
George started the topic My First Dutch Unit: Van Pallandt's Battalion in the forum Black Powder 5 years, 9 months ago
Here is a link to my posting on Tin Soldier Guy:
https://thetinsoldierguy.blogspot.com/2020/12/the-pallandt-battalion.html
-
SteveT started the topic First waves and reserve waves in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 9 months ago
This is questions that arose from an amphibious landing game, but applies to any situation with large transport units I suppose.
I have 2 landing craft each containing say 6 units.
First wave must consist of half my units, reserve wave then forming the other half.
I assume then I can only being 1 landing craft onto the map doing the first wave.…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Squishy Landing Craft in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 9 months ago
We are preparing for an amphibious landing game but its looks suicidal.
Haha I have no doubt it is. I have always thought itnwas a kiracle for a soldier to survive D-Day, as the odds of being killed were so high.
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Squishy Landing Craft in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 9 months ago
With 36 men I think you refer to the LCV . A look in the contemporary ONI 226 handbook shows it had no armor at all. The fuel tank was under the pilots position. Those with Diesel engines may be safe, those with gasoline – boom or burning.
Real world Riflemen are deadly, for example the typical German K98 user in Normandie had SMK rounds to f…[Read more]
-
SteveT replied to the topic Squishy Landing Craft in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 9 months ago
Thanks Master Chief. But it still seems that even a lone rifleman, as far as I can see, can take out a massive landing craft with a good shot. A boat so big that it can fit 36 passengers. This cannot be right?
This rule seals the deal brutally : “Remember that the superficial damage modifier only applies to armoured vehicles. Soft-skins suffer…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Squishy Landing Craft in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 9 months ago
Soft-skinned vehicles (6+) are not automatically destroyed when damage is scored by small arms fire rolling a 6. Damage by small arms against soft-skinned vehicles also need to make the additional roll on the Damage Results Against Vehicles table (Bolt Action 2nd Ed, page 108) to determine the final outcome.
-
SteveT started the topic Squishy Landing Craft in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 9 months ago
Just checking I’ve got this right…
I can find Landing Craft in a couple of Campaign Books. They have armour 6, except the big mechanised ones that have 7.
Now, it strikes me that the Armour 6 ones are going to take a hammering from any AT guns/tanks, and even a riflemen could destroy it with a single shot. Unless such craft don’t get treated…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic 6' weapons in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 9 months ago
My understanding is for 6in range weapons the Point Blank and Long Range modifiers cancel each other out, except for flamethrowers, they do not suffer the long range penalty as explained on Bolt Action 2nd Ed page 67:
Also, flamethrowers don’t rely on kinetic energy to penetrate a target’s armour, so they don’t suffer the –1 Pen penalty…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Fixed, Team movement in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 9 months ago
Bolt Action latest FAQ:
Page 67, Fixed special rule, fourth paragraph. The sentence should be changed to read as follows:
When ordered to Run, fixed weapons move the normal 12″ over open ground or 6″ over rough ground, obstacles etc.
It is always a good idea to check the latest FAQs and Errata, as many issues have probably been highlighted by…[Read more]
-
Steeljackal replied to the topic Are Rifle Grenades a small arm or heavy weapon? in the forum Bolt Action 5 years, 9 months ago
*although if you manage to get a 6 to hit as its indirect it would be very unsportsman like to pull out the ‘it doesnt say its a heavy weapon’ argument :p
I understand that can be disputes, but to me is simple to resolve.
HE1 then PEN+1, then follow all rules of heavy weapon. Rules says “heavy weapon add a bonus to the roll to damage” and “HE rou…[Read more] - Load More
