Nat

Activity

  • Hi Chrisitian, if you look in the thread wardroom FAQ, i’ve done a complete breakedown  of how AA works in the FAQ thats attached.

    In the QSR for aircraft attacking ships, they hit on their own score, no modifiers (only kamikazes say to use them, the others say not to) and evade will still take effect as its any successful attack.

  • Nat replied to the topic Competitive Ships in the forum Victory At Sea 5 years ago

    @clockwork, are you on Facebook? If so the wardroom has a document with the commonally  used in naval war games abbreviations – although most are NATO to be honest :p

     

  • I don’t think this has come up much…if at all

    now the diagrams show smoke from the base…but the rules indicate that it should be the bridge – good question will ask the wardroom!

    aircraft attacking ships in smoke, I’m tempted to say no they can’t because they wouldn’t be able to see the ships to attack…however I don’t thin the QSR says…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic The 1 inch rule in the forum Bolt Action 5 years ago

    Our club keeps a gap between infantry and other infantry so you can tell squads / teams apart… but yeah we dont bother with the 1″ between vehicles and infantry

  • I dont have battle for france or battle of the bulge.. the 2 campaign books I have dont classify RGA as either small are OR Heavy weapon…

  • yes you pick which use your aircraft have before deployment.. so 2 scouts & 2 spotting.

    During deployment, after scouting points have been spent you assign a spotter plan to an enemy ship.  The spotter stays with that ship for the duration of the game or the assigned ship is sunk.*  This then enables you to select that ship as a target for Over H…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic Rules Reference Sheet in the forum Victory At Sea 5 years ago

    I’m waiting till feb…so I’ve got the full rulebook in my hands and had a read through it (or 3!) before doing any quick refs or spreadsheets..

     

    BattleScribe has the released ships in it…(it’s a bit convoluted to get the stats to print…select a ship, select a name then a refit year)

  • Nat replied to the topic Community Introductions in the forum General Discussion 5 years ago

    @Cameron – hi there… you might want to have a look at the campaign book ‘Germany strikes’ it was (like a lot of them) written for v1 of Bolt Action but does contain a Danish army list…..

  • Nat replied to the topic A comparison in the forum Victory At Sea 5 years ago

    I’m hoping for just about every card they’ve already released to be corrected with the rules in the main rule book…..

     

    or at least give us the points to ‘refit’ the destroyers in to carrying depth charges…. (and look, we’re back to asking about proof reading! :p)

  • Nat replied to the topic Deep Deployment in the forum Victory At Sea 5 years ago

    sorry thought I had 🙁 … I’ve now uploaded v1.2

  • Nat replied to the topic Wardroom (facebook group) FAQ in the forum Victory At Sea 5 years ago

    Sorry thought I’d posted this already… its version 1.2

  • it doesnt state that small arms cant generate more than 1 pin or have a PEN value, the rule book only states that heavy weapons do and so implies that small arms cant..

    However there is more in favour of them being a heavy weapon than not*… so I’m going to leave it here and wait to see if an offical answer is ever made :p.. and be very suprised…[Read more]

  • Devils advocate here (because I’m not to bothered either way, and I’m begining to  agree it looks like the RGA should be classified as a heavy weapon… )

     

    re pins – the number of PINs a RGA generates are by the HE rule, so there is nothing to stop a small arms weapon giving multiple PINs

    re page 56, that says all heavy weapons have a PEN…[Read more]

  • I’ve asked this question on a FB group as well.. in purely rules terms is the rifle grenade adaptor classified as a small arm or a heavy weapon?

    This effects if it can hurt armoured vehicles and do exceptional damage on artillery.

  • Nat replied to the topic Deep Deployment in the forum Victory At Sea 5 years ago

    yeah…. when I saw that the FB group was getting the same questions every couple of days I wrote that FAQ so there was a single location of answers using the majority (or most compelling)answers .. some I changed 180* in the couple of versions I wrote as the authors and play testers corrected what I wrote…. but I’d have preferred it had it been…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic Deep Deployment in the forum Victory At Sea 5 years ago

    @enoich -personally I read that deep deployment doesnt allow extra flights being launched but do understand that the English used is (like the whole language :p) open to multiple interpretations…for me its that deep deployment doesnt tell you that you can start with more flights than CAP (unlike results 7 & 10)…. still so long as you and your…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic Deep Deployment in the forum Victory At Sea 5 years ago

    We’ve had this discussion with the authors (Matthew Sprange) in the Facebook group… and the wording on Deep Deployment is like that to allow for differing numbers of flights up it doesnt over-ride the rules for CAP (2 flights).  Only the result of 7 & 10 on the scouting points table do that.

    Or to put it another way, the ability to put the…[Read more]

  • Nat replied to the topic Thoughts on the Game so Far in the forum Victory At Sea 5 years ago

    The beta rules are for mongooses v2 of the game… some of the rules have been changed… so float planes might not actually appear as while they are in the beta they are also included in the aircraft X trait…. but no observation planes are in the QSR.

    So i’d hold off until end of Jan when the rule book is released before trying to alter…[Read more]

  • in a field situation there is no such thing as equipment in the wrong place… the ammo pouch is where the hand goes, same with bayonet fob…. but its how the individual wants to carry it (we used to be able to tell whos belt kit was whos by that).

    also you are looking at everyone carrying kit for squad weapons … ie whilst the gunner and…[Read more]

  • I’m enquiring more on a specific nation level not a general… ie where the british ones cast iron?  french & austrian brass?  what where the Russians?

     

    I’ve had a quick (5 min) google… but cant seem to find anything specific 🙁 …so wondering if anyone on here had any clue or direction for investigation..ta

  • Load More