Activity
-
Nat replied to the topic AWI – Number of models in flank companies? in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 10 months ago
Not AWI, but Napoleonics… I’ve got for my french i’ve got 4 Light, 4 Grenadiers & a 4 strong command party (flag, officer, muscian & soldier). Then the rest of the unit (4 in a small, 12 in a normal, 20 in a large unit) are all standard guys.
My Napoleonic russians who are slightly different in that their line regiments where 4 companies, 3…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Flamethrower and moral check in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 10 months ago
I’ve always read it that the flamethrower basically counts it as if the target has lost 50%+ of the unit even if they hadnt (or are a vehicle)… IE just the 1 moral check.
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Flamethrower and moral check in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 10 months ago
There is a slight modification in the FAQs:
Page 67, Flamethrower special rule, last paragraph on page. The first sentence should be changed to read as follows:
A unit hit by a flamethrower must check its morale once firing has been worked out and pin markers allocated, as described above.
-
Steeljackal replied to the topic Flamethrower and moral check in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 10 months ago
I had always read the rule as a modification to point 7 of the shotting procedure “target checks morale”
“…
SHOOTING
SHOOTING PROCEDURE
1. Declare target
2. Target reacts
3. Measure range and open fire
4. Roll to hit
5. Roll to damage
6. Target takes casualties
7. Target checks morale
…”not that it counted as an additional moral test “…The…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Flamethrower against vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 10 months ago
Yes you roll D6 to determine the number of hits. In your example you get 4 hits, so roll 4D6 with Pen +3, and each 8+ scores 1 damage. For each damage roll on the vehicle damage table to determine its effect.
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Flamethrower and moral check in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 10 months ago
Yes I think that is correct.
-
Master Chief replied to the topic US InR Platoon OB in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 10 months ago
Battle of the Bulge page 25:
Aside from the exceptions detailed below, the Intelligence Officer is not a separate unit choice but an optional upgrade for an officer unit. Whereas the standard officer unit is allowed to be accompanied by up to 2 further men, the Intelligence Officer counts as a separate upgrade; in effect, a fourth man.
Based on…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Mortar Team Zeroing in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 10 months ago
Unless you were targeting the building …
If I recall correctly you can only target a building if it is empty. If there is an enemy unit inside you need to fire at that unit.
-
Nat replied to the topic Mortar Team Zeroing in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 10 months ago
Unless you were targeting the building (pointless with most mortars as you need 10+ hits to hurt the building) then yes you need to start again as the target units foot print has moved more than 2″
-
invisible officer replied to the topic New Blog Post in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 10 months ago
For me it was interesting reading.
Not my view on the world but interesting to see that others have problems that are none for me.
The only one ever harmed by my wargames had been me, steel pikes can be……….
———–
The Prussian army since 1847, the German Heer in 1914-18 and 1939-45 had GOTT MIT UNS (God with us) on the bel…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic US Marine army suggestions in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 10 months ago
Check out the Mariana book where the new Marines Assault squad can be upgraded with a flamethrower. The new Peleliu marine squads can have 2 flamethrowers, but they can only be used in Peleliu specific scenarios.
-
George started the topic New Blog Post in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 10 months ago
This time I wrote an article. It is about my faith and being a historical wargamer.
https://thetinsoldierguy.blogspot.com/2021/02/on-being-christian-and-historical.html
-
Master Chief replied to the topic US InR Platoon OB in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 10 months ago
Printed in the latest FAQ:
Page 27: I&R Platoon HQ. Insert new Special Rule:
Note – Whilst this entry is listed as a ‘Platoon HQ’ it is acting in the intelligence and reconnaissance role and so is still subject to the note on page 26; i.e. this is an intelligence officer, not an infantry officer and therefore does not confer morale bonuses or gi…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic New player here in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 10 months ago
@Jacob Carter – that squad entry is also found in the ‘Campaign: battle of the bulge’ book and doesnt really over ride the paratroopers entry in the ‘armies of …’ book as it covers the change of TOE they had during the war. Just like the British Armies of book has two paratrooper entries
Its PAratrooper (late war) and should only be used…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Snipers and vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 10 months ago
So a few examples to help Stiener out..
example 1, small arms v softskin – roll to hit as normal, on hit apply 1 pin, roll to wound, on a 6 roll a D6 on the damage chart (no mods)
example 2, HMG v soft skin – roll to hit, if 1+ hit apply 1 pin, roll as many hits to wound, each 5+* is a roll on the damage chart (no mods)
*ie after apply the HMGs…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic New player here in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 10 months ago
Hi both welcome to the wonderful game!
The lists in the rulebook are a ‘get you by’ lists and are superseded by the ‘armies of…’ books. IE if you have both ignore the lists in the rulebook.
Some units have entries in campaign books and not the armies of ..’ books so dont worry if people mention stuff you dont have rules for (check out…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Snipers and vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 10 months ago
Ah I see what you mean now. Yes you are right, we still need to roll on the vehicle damage chart 👍
-
Nat replied to the topic Snipers and vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 10 months ago
hmmm…..confused now! (doesnt take a lot some days :p)..I’m reading what you’ve written differently…. its reading to me like your saying if you roll a 6 to wound then that’s it the softskin is dead.
But they are still a vehicle, so you still need to roll on the vehicle damage chart (4+ to kill it… so a sniper who hits then rolls the 6 to…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic Snipers and vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 10 months ago
Yes that’s basically what I said but in a longer winded way 😂 A sniper hitting a soft-skin kills it (automatic exceptional damage of 6+), hitting an armoured open-topped just pins it (because its automatic exceptional damage only scores a 6+ and cannot damage armoured open-topped vehicles).
-
Nat replied to the topic Snipers and vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 10 months ago
Sorry @Master Cheif but the Exceptional damage rule doesnt come in to this as the sniper (unless its OstFront Ziestsev) needs a 6 to wound the softskin, as a small arms theres no bonuses to the wounding roll against a vehicle. Once its ‘wounded’ you then roll on the vehicle damage chart. There is nothing on that chart that allows for m…[Read more]
- Load More
