Activity
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Streams in Combat in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 6 months ago
The 6 inch movement penalty is significant and might add to the fire the attackers receive. If the stream is a significant obstacle, I would give the defenders the ‘stubborn’ rule while defending the stream. I use this approach to give uphill units an advantage.
-
Nat replied to the topic Quick question regarding evade! order in the forum Victory At Sea 4 years, 6 months ago
Being locked in a dogfight doesnt prevent you from attacking a ship 😮 Think of it as the bomber /dive bomber on its attack run and the defending fighters swoop in on its tail… the gunners on the ship cant target the attcker because they might hit their own guys behind but the guy behind wont get close enough to shoot the bomber down before it…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Quick question regarding evade! order in the forum Victory At Sea 4 years, 6 months ago
Hi Finn,
flights cant escort ships….infact it’s the worst thing to do to engage flights that are touching your ships as then your aa can’t target them, so you have no chance of destroying them before they attack your ships. (Dogfights happen at the end of the gunnery phase)
the AA batteries (but not light guns firing DP) have a ‘fire step’…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Artillery being charged. in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 6 months ago
If you think your Napoleonic Artillery is going to end up in combat then Spanish is the way to go…..as they get to hold and not just break :p
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Artillery being charged. in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 6 months ago
So the cavalry passed the charge to contact break test using the shooting line on the break test, as in the FAQ 2010, rather than the RAW.
-
Nat changed their profile picture 4 years, 6 months ago
-
Nat replied to the topic Regimental Artillery in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 6 months ago
Depends what you mean by Regimental Artillery? The Clash of Eagles Napoleonic entries are for Battalion guns:
full is 3/2/1 – stam 2, half is 1/1/1 stam 1
Range 24″
Battery size – same as any artillery, so how your local club plays it (normally from what I’ve seen is 1 for half or 2 for full).
Moves the same as Infantry without needing to be…[Read more] -
invisible officer replied to the topic Quick question regarding evade! order in the forum Victory At Sea 4 years, 6 months ago
Sorry Eumerin, but that is just partly true. As you wrote, “some”. Water is not absorbing the full energy of a near miss. In part it transports it. The KTB of German vessels in Channel are full of near misses by small bombs and reports that they did a lot of damage. Cracks in hull, damaged screws and rudder.   Like the DC that can destr…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Attacking buildings in the forum Cruel Seas 4 years, 6 months ago
Well, the Tallboy did not blow up the Bunker but the concussion did a lot of damage inside. Damaging the repair facilties like the cranes inside fixed to the roof. The KM KTB tells a lot about that. But no boat was destroyed, the bunkers had been a good investment.
Similar to WW I, the German 42 cm Dicke Bertha grenade missed the fortress w…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Attacking buildings in the forum Cruel Seas 4 years, 7 months ago
IIRC RAF dropped tallboy and grand slam bombs on a U-Boat pen in france… the U-Boat Pen is still there, the bombs that hit didnt penatrate it.
-
George started the topic Comparing Black Powder to Piquet: Field of Battle Rules in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 7 months ago
I wrote a post on my blog. Feel free to check it out and comment.
https://thetinsoldierguy.blogspot.com/2021/06/comparing-black-powder-to-field-of.html
-
invisible officer replied to the topic Attacking buildings in the forum Cruel Seas 4 years, 7 months ago
Well, the S-Boot or U-Boot Bunker will not be harmed by anything a Naval vessel could throw on it. Only the biggest blockbuster boms yould damage them. And against torpedoes there had been defences too. No wonder that there was no successfull ship attack on the big bunkers. Destroying German WW II bunkers was hard work. Blowing up mostly failed.…[Read more]
-
invisible officer replied to the topic How robust are the models? in the forum Black Seas 4 years, 7 months ago
Hi Nigel,
I play with fully rigged sailing ships in 1/1200 and 1/300. Even with standing and running rig they are very durable. The simpler rigging done by most on the Black sea models will stand to all ordinary forms of game use.
OK, if you throw them at the wall…….. 😉
-
Nat replied to the topic No answer from Customer Care in the forum General Discussion 4 years, 7 months ago
If on FB or discord drop them a DM with your email address as I’ve had mine end up in their spam system before….
I generally leave it 2 days if I’ve not had an auto response (its happened twice) I contact one of the team via FB and they look into where the emails gone.
-
Nat replied to the topic Quick question regarding evade! order in the forum Victory At Sea 4 years, 7 months ago
You’ve hit on 2 subjects which come up a fair bit over on the wardroom facebook group, and Warlord have (unfortunatly in my opionion) ‘doubled down’ on by not acknowleging the issue(s) and saying they’re all fine in the FAQ:
Points – dispite the comment on page 129 saying its balanced for pickup games, they are only any good as a rough guide……[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Quick question regarding evade! order in the forum Victory At Sea 4 years, 7 months ago
Yes,
Against tough or very tough flights all the hits need to come from the same weapon system (so 1 ship basically) at the same time – so calling tough 2 HP is a bit wrong, its more that tough counts the first hit as a miss.
However dont forget that DP only fires when the ship fires in the gunnery phase not in the defensive fire step when the AA…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic Quick question regarding evade! order in the forum Victory At Sea 4 years, 7 months ago
oh one thing I didnt notice before, you said DD re-rolled…
Just to make sure – its the 1 AD thats re-rolled, all flights (except the JU88 torpedo bomber* & the IJN Emily bomber* and some flights in the scenarios) have a single AD which – like a torpedo or Battleships main gun has multiple DD.eg the B17 level bomber rolls 1 AD hitting on a 5+,…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Quick question regarding evade! order in the forum Victory At Sea 4 years, 7 months ago
Yes, its an attack so is re-rolled. The only time this wouldnt happen is if the attacker is a kamikaze or has the twin linked rule, then (as per the FAQ) you may decide that both the re-rolls cancel each other out.
-
SteveT replied to the topic Finnish special rule in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 7 months ago
Yes, wounded (well, killed, removed) only on a 5+ after being hit (5 being the “penetration number” needed). But bear in mind some weapons have bonuses to penetration rolls.
-
Garry Wills replied to the topic Smoothbore Musket Range Relative to Artillery Ranges in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 7 months ago
Welcome to Black Powder. I think the rules were written for more crowded 28 mm scale battlefields. I play in 15mm and have increased the artillery ranges by 25% and this seems to work. When you try historical scenarios it is obvious that the artillery ranges are too short. However I still keep the short range at the equivalent of 6 inches (6 cms…[Read more]
- Load More
