-
Master Chief replied to the topic V3: Forward Observer counts as Spotter as per p. 102, regarding being "Down"? in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
The reason I asked is because in the 2nd Edition FAQs this is exactly the explanation given for spotters not being able to spot from transports … because officers and HQ units’ abilities do not affect units outside the transport 🤷♂️ I believe in the 2nd Edition there was only one German vehicular unit that can act as a mobile…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic V3: Forward Observer counts as Spotter as per p. 102, regarding being "Down"? in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
I’d say no, they’re not HQ units so why would they get the explict HQ allowance for seeing /working out of transports…. plus their 10 points each with multiple buffs from v2.
-
Nat replied to the topic Missing vehicles in easy army. in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
(dont worry I know what you mean …. I have a 3rd Ed metal sisters army….)
v3 was needed because of the size of the FAQ… but seen as the army books (less germany) were all v1 and the v2 rulebook lasted 12 years!
-
sunny rothfusz replied to the topic Missing vehicles in easy army. in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
Also 2,40 a month?
I can live with that.
Using the app from now on. -
sunny rothfusz replied to the topic Missing vehicles in easy army. in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
Thank you Nat.
This clears things up, as I said i’m new to the game as a former warhammer 40K refugee.
Getting sick of codexxes and rule books having a 3 year shelf life at best i looked for other games.
So sorry for jumping to the legends conclusion, it’s just past trauma.
R.I.P. Celestians , Repressor.Thank you again for clearing things up.
-
Master Chief replied to the topic V3: Forward Observer counts as Spotter as per p. 102, regarding being "Down"? in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
While on the topic of spotters, do the new 3rd Edition rules on page 147 regarding the ability of officers and other HQ units on transports mean that spotters on transports can spot? (One of the current 3rd Ed FAQs also mentioned that the spotter’s ability is a passive ability that is “always on”)
-
Nat replied to the topic Missing vehicles in easy army. in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
So Easy Army is NOT official… it used to be, but hasn’t been for the last couple of years. The official army builder is the Warlord App (found on google & apple play stores) that is behind a paywall. Easy Army is currently upto date on the major armies for v3 but the one guy who runs it is still working on updating the minor nations.
What w…[Read more]
-
sunny rothfusz started the topic Missing vehicles in easy army. in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
Hi ,
I’m pretty new to the game ( 2 full armies V3 ready but never played because it took me over 2 years to find players in Holland)
Now i found some opponents I am starting to build lists using easy army.
Seeing as the extention of easy army is WG. i take it this is a official affiliate?
But i’m missing a lot of options when it comes to our…[Read more] -
Ken Jacobsen replied to the topic Assaults in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
Good response Nat, thanks.
-
Nat replied to the topic Assaults in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
problems – after 5 seconds of thinking….
1) movement, you cant move within 1″ of another unit including friendly… so you need a 3-4″ path.. oh and you have to go round terrain, but how can you do that AND stay 1″ away from your other unit?
2) Ambush & reactions – the how and when – as if doing it sequenctially i’d get a clear shot off but…[Read more] -
Ken Jacobsen replied to the topic Assaults in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
I understand the rule for assaults, I’m asking a design philosophy question. If someone were to say “2 squads, if given a Snap To, should be able to Assault the same target simultaneously” how would you refute that statement………other than saying “that’s the rule”?
-
Stuart Harrison replied to the topic Assaults in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
The fact you complete the orders in sequence (any sequence you like) not simultaneously. You still have to see what one unit achieves before the other can start it’s assault.
-
Ken Jacobsen started the topic Assaults in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
With Assaults being much less common in v3, what’s the argument against using a Snap To order to allows 2 squads to assault simultaneously?
-
Stuart Harrison replied to the topic Roll for Vehicle Damage in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
There are no exceptions to the ‘natural 1 is a fail’.
You need a successful roll to damage to destroy a soft skin or open-topped armoured vehicle in close quarters, all the automatic bit does is skip the damage results charts once you’ve achieved that successful roll to damage.
-
McBolterson's profile was updated 1 year, 8 months ago
-
Ken started the topic Roll for Vehicle Damage in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
Does the unmodified roll of 1 always always fails to damage rule apply to Assaults on vehicles ?
Assaulted an open top armored car 7+ armor, got 6 hits, rolled a 1 to damage.
Thought it was blown up since it was open top, local rules guru said that a 1 fails to damage.
Friendly game so not worried about it but want to know if it applies to…[Read more] -
Stuart Harrison replied to the topic Sniper and Squad Team Weapon V3 in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
“On p. 122, it is explained that the player who successfully rolls to hit and damage can choose which model to remove.”
That is not what it says.
It says “If the sniper successfully rolls to hit and damage, the firing player can pick the squad leader in the target unit as the casualty,” next sentence extends that to leaders of other infantry…[Read more]
-
Fabrizio Anastasio started the topic Sniper and Squad Team Weapon V3 in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
Hello,
in our local store, we ran into a difficult interpretation of the rule and I would like to get your opinion.
Casualties:
P.88 states that you can remove casualties in any way you like, despite breaking cohesion, and it is assumed that another teammate will collect team weapons from his teammates.Sniper:
On p. 122, it is explained that…[Read more] -
Greg replied to the topic Dismounting from a Recce vehicle after it makes an Escape Move in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
Thanks, Stuart. I’ll be watching during the Millennium Con Bolt Action tournament at the end of October.
-
Stuart Harrison replied to the topic Dismounting from a Recce vehicle after it makes an Escape Move in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 8 months ago
Would have been viable under the previous editions as a unit that makes an escape move ended as Down. Now it is marked as Advance or Run depending on how far it escaped.
I’d be making sure that opponent was complying with the requirements of the escape – out of sight, if that’s not possible, at least in cover, if that’s not possible, further a…[Read more]
- Load More
