Warlord Games | Site-Wide Activity https://www.warlordgames.com/activity/ Activity feed for the entire site. Tue, 15 Sep 2026 03:26:04 +0100 https://buddypress.org/?v= en-GB 30 hourly 2 3b5212ff697befd118d9096ab2a690f9 coljacksimpson57 replied to the topic Signaling Bugle in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/signaling-bugle/#post-191941 Mon, 14 Sep 2026 14:32:46 +0100 Ye gads, how did I miss the key word “enemy”? I must have had too much blood in my alcohol system.  Much obliged, Stuart.  It was driving me to distraction.

]]> 0 03f4a60835d38f7cc0d99a1c790dab80 Stuart Harrison replied to the topic Signaling Bugle in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/signaling-bugle/#post-191940 Sun, 13 Sep 2026 22:38:20 +0100 You missed a key word – ‘enemy’.  “All Inexperienced enemy Infantry and Artillery units…”

It’s not a downgrade to your own inexperienced units, it’s a downgrade to the enemy’s inexperienced units.

]]> 0 4d8237a73a82d1bbef68877a48b29665 coljacksimpson57 started the topic Signaling Bugle in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/signaling-bugle/ Sun, 13 Sep 2026 21:56:51 +0100 The BA3E Armies of Japan Officer entry allows one of his escorts to have a bugle for +10 points.  The Quartermaster notes states that this causes inexperienced infantry & artillery units to suffer a -1 penalty to their morale rating and no accompanying benefit. I searched the BA3E Rulebook & the BA3E Armies of Japan book but found no further…[Read more]

]]> 0 bb87d0a541344648cc6d5af9da442603 Stuart Harrison replied to the topic H.Q. Units in Transport Vehicle in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/h-q-units-in-transport-vehicle/#post-191938 Sun, 13 Sep 2026 06:18:40 +0100 @ Eric – I didn’t write the rules, I only quoted them.

Bolt Action doesn’t currently include rules for artillery (or air, for that matter) observation vehicles, which would most likely result in the vehicle itself having that ability rather than carrying passengers and allowing them to use their ability from that vehicle.  If the rules were…[Read more]

]]> 0 1d59b32b4f9a5f7fe74436624569b26d Kar98k replied to the topic Panzerschreck Costs in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/panzerschreck-costs/#post-191937 Sun, 13 Sep 2026 00:58:39 +0100

Why is the FG42, the automatic rifle of the Fallschirmjaeger considered an assault rifle?

Rise up and take control…

The FG42 in Bolt Action, and how easy it is to fix the error.

]]> 0 c0ab2296940b0f8a14d2db14b70c3f38 Eric T Holmes replied to the topic Panzerschreck Costs in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/panzerschreck-costs/#post-191936 Sat, 12 Sep 2026 11:57:59 +0100 Hello … Mr Russel has the best observation in regards to this GAME … as I’ve been told by dozens of players from around the US … I’ve played in New York state, Minnesota, New Mexico, and Florida … If you want to play “Hollywood,”  okay, play the rules as written.  If you want to “Simulate” the combat conditions of WW2, play against s…[Read more]

]]> 0 634e8fe56d9331aa016f22884ad21c5e Eric T Holmes replied to the topic Special Figures in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/special-figures/#post-191935 Sat, 12 Sep 2026 11:36:41 +0100 I’ve been waiting for Warlord to create an Audie Murphy figure, a full set of “Combat!” figures, I thought they had a line of Nisei figures, but I think that went away, and they use some of the special figures to sell new editions of their “army” books.  I’ve stopped trying to create vignettes as objective markers because nobody seems to want to…[Read more]

]]> 0 d67a818caf9711096ee402984da9f596 Eric T Holmes replied to the topic H.Q. Units in Transport Vehicle in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/h-q-units-in-transport-vehicle/#post-191934 Sat, 12 Sep 2026 11:27:56 +0100 Umm … Stuart, you’ve neglected the fact that in the German Army an SdKfz 253 was an artillery spotting vehicle and there were some radio equipped versions of the SdKfz 251 that were used as artillery spotting vehicles.  Let’s face it, all  you’re talking about is a “moving, rolling” foxhole when it comes to a vehicle carrying a forward o…[Read more]

]]> 0 18a0bbc93b59dca9aa24a21ae827b35a Eric T Holmes replied to the topic Forgotten Forces Beta: A Unofficial Expansion for Bolt Action 3rd Edition in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/forgotten-forces-beta-a-unofficial-expansion-for-bolt-action-3rd-edition/#post-191933 Sat, 12 Sep 2026 11:05:47 +0100 Josh,

Wow, this is a very cool idea for a supplement.  I especially liked the Soviet-Japanese portion of your supplement.  When I had my Japanese army, I built it along the lines of the 1930s Army.

Now I’m gonna have to rebuild that army to play against my Soviets … damn … more figures to paint, LOL.

Roll Sixes!

]]> 0 51772e4fb69fa893dd2dc677f1bc00db Eric T Holmes replied to the topic Rules Questions in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/rules-questions/page/37/#post-191932 Sat, 12 Sep 2026 10:59:01 +0100 Here’s another conundrum concerning MMG armed transports. Except for any internal hull mounted MMGs, passengers had been known to grab the external MMGs and use them for their own fire power.  Think of the German Panzer Grenadiers or the American Armored Infantry units. The guns went with them and their transports pulled away.  (Yeah, yeah, yeah .…[Read more]

]]> 0 1c7551fe95343f23abe88fc0318acd57 Eric T Holmes replied to the topic Rules Questions in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/rules-questions/page/37/#post-191931 Sat, 12 Sep 2026 10:48:53 +0100 Can Soviet Platoon Leaders and Company Commanders ride tanks if their platoon is made up of Tank Riders?  Also, can the Light Mortars, and any ancillary Teams ride the tanks, as well?

If the Officer has a Banner assigned to its team, and the officer team is riding on top of a tank, is the banner displayed?  This is dependent on the previous q…[Read more]

]]> 0 47145f367c804879d2e327f017051639 Raf De Backer started the topic Walkers in the forum Konflikt '47 https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/walkers/ Sun, 06 Sep 2026 17:16:22 +0100 When a walker makes a run to charge into combat, can the unit being charged fight back because you can t hit a running vehicle?

]]> 0 6060d73962df5f6fba32b56d60f7c8cc Kar98k replied to the topic What a fantastic idea to improve the game in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/what-a-fantastic-idea-to-improve-the-game/#post-191926 Mon, 31 Aug 2026 01:42:53 +0100 Here is another idea for dealing with “Meeting Engagement” (page 170) and using “Orders Phase – Random Ending”. In the unlikely event units in the first wave do not enter the game on turn 1, they automatically go into reserves with no choice to outflank.

]]> 0 270904363f6a1b7188ae0f0275e89d97 Baron Von Wreckedoften started the topic What colour(s) did the major navies paint their torpedoes? in the forum Cruel Seas https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/what-colours-did-the-major-navies-paint-their-torpedoes/ Sun, 30 Aug 2026 15:21:08 +0100 I have recently inherited some British, German, American and Italian MTBs, S-Boats etc from the estate of a deceased friend and long-time gaming buddy.  They include a couple of sprues of torpedo “models”.  Is there an on-line source for what colour(s) each nation painted their “fish”?

(Obviously if someone knows the exact colours I’m happy to r…[Read more]

]]> 0 f657d34f7a4826bae3c454eebd0a3f37 Jim Ripley replied to the topic The Army Book listing for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL - it must be a mistake. in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/the-army-book-listing-for-the-sd-kfz-251-9-stummel-it-must-be-a-mistake/page/2/#post-191924 Mon, 24 Aug 2026 12:59:22 +0100 Hmm , I’ve always thought of the Stuka zu Fus as mobile artillery  (armed with rockets ) , much like the Katyusha .  Pictures seem to show them in battery groups of numerous vehicles . They would get the target info from the forward OP and all fire at once carpeting the target in a rain of fire . I’m not sure they operated as  a single entity . Pl…[Read more]

]]> 0 aba61154d0333b8109ce6dbb628751f1 Kar98k replied to the topic The Army Book listing for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL - it must be a mistake. in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/the-army-book-listing-for-the-sd-kfz-251-9-stummel-it-must-be-a-mistake/page/2/#post-191922 Mon, 24 Aug 2026 02:06:58 +0100 Following Steiner’s (@spartan18a) lead, I was curious what ChatGPT (AI) had to say, so for fun, I asked it this Question:

If I were to write a WW2 skirmish rule set for tabletop miniature gaming were one figure is equal to one soldier and one vehicle model is one half-track, should the SdKfz 251/9 Stummel be given a transport ability to carry…[Read more]

]]> 0 5cbba35fb067e25bf99c4c0fd0f85e3e Kar98k replied to the topic Spotters v Snipers in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/spotters-v-snipers/#post-191921 Sat, 22 Aug 2026 11:58:31 +0100 Note that snipers and spotters have the Infiltrator special rule.

New players sometimes forget the additional +1 to cover saves. Provided it is not advancing or running (from an order die).

]]> 0 b243b38ad5f8d3f9afa53fca8461c2ff Jim welch replied to the topic Buildings and extra protection in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/buildings-and-extra-protection/#post-191917 Sat, 22 Aug 2026 09:02:46 +0100 Can I say this rule on buildings have no save from direct HE fire is mad as a unit sitting behind a few twigs and leaves get a cover save from HE. I can kind of see what is being said but they can’t have it both ways. How can a Twigs stop an HE round and a brick wall can’t better to give a building type a defence value like Vehicles like nil for…[Read more]

]]> 0 be19837ec95e0c3ade49ec0c3e2c8834 Jim welch replied to the topic Buildings and extra protection in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/buildings-and-extra-protection/#post-191916 Sat, 22 Aug 2026 08:50:44 +0100 Can I say this rule on buildings have no save from direct HE fire is made as a unit sitting behind a ew twigs and leaves get a cover save from HE. I can kind of see what is being said but they can’t have it both ways. How can a Twigs stop an HE round and a brick wall can’t better to give a building type a defence value like Vehicles like nil for…[Read more]

]]> 0 7c5f24e281db0157bcc07779ae3a2257 Stuart Harrison replied to the topic Spotters v Snipers in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/spotters-v-snipers/#post-191915 Sat, 22 Aug 2026 02:33:37 +0100 Vastly different in game ‘units’.

Firstly, snipers have their own order die that they don’t have to share with another unit.

Secondly, a sniper’s main action requires a Fire order while a spotter’s main action is entirely passive not drawing attention to themselves.

]]> 0 6328c23959f75039ff95e03e664472cf Stuart Harrison replied to the topic Rules Questions in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/rules-questions/page/37/#post-191914 Sat, 22 Aug 2026 01:52:50 +0100 “In the rules when talking about teams weapons you hint at more than LMG  being used a section level is this possible?” – there are multiple units in the game with team weapons other than LMG at section level – examples include light mortars (eg: Japanese grenadier sections,) and flame throwers (engineer sections for multiple nations).

Light…[Read more]

]]> 0 b024e9ab2d04212f636f5f4334443bba Garrick Ruscher replied to the topic K47 North America Player Finder in the forum Konflikt '47 https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/k47-north-america-player-finder/page/2/#post-191913 Fri, 21 Aug 2026 21:22:03 +0100 Garrick, Montgomery Texas.  An hour north of Houston

]]> 0 e1d188600b2d997bf733e52e67cde4e6 Jim welch replied to the topic Rules Questions in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/rules-questions/page/37/#post-191912 Fri, 21 Aug 2026 18:41:59 +0100 Light Mortars and the Brutish Paras. Hi The British Para had light mortars down to Section Level. In the rules when talking about teams weapons you hint at more than LMG  being used a section level is this possible? It’s seems This could have been addressed in the  army list. To note these where a Modified weapon used to lay Smoke only. 6 Rou…[Read more]

]]> 0 e2c07c4013045e94f9132bf3ef216676 Jim welch started the topic Spotters v Snipers in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/spotters-v-snipers/ Fri, 21 Aug 2026 18:29:12 +0100 Why don’t snipers not count as down like spotters?

]]> 0 1ce66ab87bab14b8770b7a0a59b8faf8 Anthony Miles replied to the topic Rules Questions in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/rules-questions/page/37/#post-191910 Thu, 20 Aug 2026 16:51:19 +0100 Thanks

]]> 0 a2464dc94a1126718b81e485cec3747f Jim Ripley replied to the topic The Army Book listing for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL - it must be a mistake. in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/the-army-book-listing-for-the-sd-kfz-251-9-stummel-it-must-be-a-mistake/#post-191907 Thu, 20 Aug 2026 13:36:12 +0100 I tried that block of figures and didn’t like it . Also tried the 6 man metal seated troop set . They are more scale but their feet made it difficult to jam them in . . Looking at pictures there wasn’t much room in the 251 , you were pretty much shoulder to shoulder and how you fit with canteen , bread bag , etc making you wider at the hips I have…[Read more]

]]> 0 ef8ef28bc8fb39c5a1c8ba46935986e0 Kepler replied to the topic The Army Book listing for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL - it must be a mistake. in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/the-army-book-listing-for-the-sd-kfz-251-9-stummel-it-must-be-a-mistake/#post-191906 Thu, 20 Aug 2026 03:00:46 +0100 I really do wish it was all truly the same scale. It’s especially annoying for me when they’re inconsistent with armaments; two vehicles will have the same gun but it’s visibly much larger on one model because it was designed to emphasize the gunner, at infantry scale. And like you noted, I prefer to assemble all of my tanks with hatches closed…[Read more]

]]> 0 94c67d6de9118ddcb536d0e966474eb3 Jim Ripley replied to the topic The Army Book listing for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL - it must be a mistake. in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/the-army-book-listing-for-the-sd-kfz-251-9-stummel-it-must-be-a-mistake/#post-191905 Thu, 20 Aug 2026 01:29:15 +0100 I think if WG had scaled their troops to actual 28mm scale ( what ever that is ) , and made the vehicles the same , we might be better off . I have 3 of the plastic Bedford troop carrier trucks for which WG gives you 10 seated troops for the rear . I managed to fit in 12 by removing the center row of seats ( 6 each side ) . IRC the truck is…[Read more]

]]> 0 8e09621fe51a570e6b22313ae117321b Kepler replied to the topic The Army Book listing for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL - it must be a mistake. in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/the-army-book-listing-for-the-sd-kfz-251-9-stummel-it-must-be-a-mistake/#post-191904 Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:51:49 +0100 Sorry, that was entirely a tangent. It is, of course, completely correct to note that the forward facing machine gun should be coaxial rather than pintle-mounted, but this is nevertheless a huge nerf to the capability of the vehicle. Being able to shoot both the howitzer and a forward machine gun in the same turn made it very strong for its cost,…[Read more]

]]> 0 3712afe338d389210a79f08587f66ffb Kar98k replied to the topic The Army Book listing for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL - it must be a mistake. in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/the-army-book-listing-for-the-sd-kfz-251-9-stummel-it-must-be-a-mistake/#post-191903 Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:56:21 +0100

I built mine with the bench seats to emphasize its role as a transport vehicle in my army list (which I’ve since removed, since they nerfed it in the errata), but the vehicle can be built with space for them.

@Kepler: Please elaborate. Why you think they nerfed it in the errata? For the newest errata, it only says to change this:

PAGE 74. S…[Read more]

]]> 0 74416b217e85c7e665b5ceb73526f2ce Jim Ripley replied to the topic The Army Book listing for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL - it must be a mistake. in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/the-army-book-listing-for-the-sd-kfz-251-9-stummel-it-must-be-a-mistake/#post-191902 Tue, 18 Aug 2026 22:57:20 +0100 It has always been obvious to me that the Warlord guys who think up the rule sets , are gamer / painters  1st and foremost and probably have no real interest in real life WW2 vehicles . Some of the weird stuff they put in the rules just makes me shake my head . It’s supposed to be just a game though …. .

The rear benches were really just…[Read more]

]]> 0 86bc28c3ba321097139061b7d0e47a15 Kepler replied to the topic The Army Book listing for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL - it must be a mistake. in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/the-army-book-listing-for-the-sd-kfz-251-9-stummel-it-must-be-a-mistake/#post-191900 Tue, 18 Aug 2026 20:49:33 +0100 I believe they only have the one kit, but with multiple assembly options. I built mine with the bench seats to emphasize its role as a transport vehicle in my army list (which I’ve since removed, since they nerfed it in the errata), but the vehicle can be built with space for them.

I’d like to reiterate I’m not arguing with you about the correct…[Read more]

]]> 0 3a201c00df23e5dd665a954cc89541d2 Jim Ripley replied to the topic The Army Book listing for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL - it must be a mistake. in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/the-army-book-listing-for-the-sd-kfz-251-9-stummel-it-must-be-a-mistake/#post-191898 Tue, 18 Aug 2026 18:05:41 +0100 Here’s a picture of a C chassis . 1. Driver .  2. Gunner   3. Loader   4. Commander   X. 3-4 guys crammed in .  Y. 2-3 guys on top of ammo storage . Not really something you would want to be in advancing under fire , plus the gun couldn’t fire . If you had to bug out PDQ , uncomfy but your haulin ass out of trouble

 

]]> 0 38dd1b524d92eee4462898d73d3fa6e9 Kar98k replied to the topic The Army Book listing for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL - it must be a mistake. in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/the-army-book-listing-for-the-sd-kfz-251-9-stummel-it-must-be-a-mistake/#post-191896 Tue, 18 Aug 2026 13:53:09 +0100

“It does come with bench seats, and I was able to assemble it with the four passenger models it came with plus the loader standing in the aisle.” “…the model could fit 8 passengers just as well as the stock Hanomags would be able to carry 12.”

Interesting, and I have to ask. What model do you have? My model (see pic below) can just fit the crew,…[Read more]

]]> 0 65fb0cc501bece09b5fbf0464b2f62e1 Jim Ripley replied to the topic The Army Book listing for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL - it must be a mistake. in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/the-army-book-listing-for-the-sd-kfz-251-9-stummel-it-must-be-a-mistake/#post-191895 Mon, 17 Aug 2026 23:00:51 +0100 Looking at internal pictures of the 251/9 I would say they could cram 6 – 7 guys to the rear of the gun . The crew of the /9 would be  3-4 ( driver , gunner . loader /commander ) , and they could stand either side of the gun mount . It’s pretty tight in there and I don’t think you would be able to have too much personal gear on because of the…[Read more]

]]> 0 a62ab75ee25ec8fefd404350f68a1d6d Kepler replied to the topic The Army Book listing for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL - it must be a mistake. in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/the-army-book-listing-for-the-sd-kfz-251-9-stummel-it-must-be-a-mistake/#post-191894 Mon, 17 Aug 2026 16:44:40 +0100 Regardless of historical accuracy, this is very clearly an intentional decision, as the rulebook entry for the 251/9 is exactly the same as the 250/8 on the preceding page, save for the addition of transport capacity. As for the model itself, the only reason we couldn’t fit 8 men inside would be the discrepancy between infantry and vehicle scale…[Read more]

]]> 0 1f5120370b740b891c747f1c67a7fe53 Stuart Harrison replied to the topic The Army Book listing for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL - it must be a mistake. in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/the-army-book-listing-for-the-sd-kfz-251-9-stummel-it-must-be-a-mistake/#post-191893 Sun, 16 Aug 2026 08:24:28 +0100 I’m not arguing with you on that.  The facts are a sound basis for a house rule.

The authors cementing it in the rules (specifically enabling it to function as a vehicle with transport capacity in an SP gun slot) rather than simply correcting it in first edition means you’re unlikely to get an official change.

]]> 0 10eb9dd75d783b44564e6102f1290738 Kar98k replied to the topic The Army Book listing for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL - it must be a mistake. in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/the-army-book-listing-for-the-sd-kfz-251-9-stummel-it-must-be-a-mistake/#post-191892 Sun, 16 Aug 2026 08:00:42 +0100 But the simple fact remains. The SdKfz 251/9 Stummel was only used for close support and not designed to carry passengers.

]]> 0 441e5727eea54abc6fc42c765ec96c6f Stuart Harrison replied to the topic The Army Book listing for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL - it must be a mistake. in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/the-army-book-listing-for-the-sd-kfz-251-9-stummel-it-must-be-a-mistake/#post-191891 Sun, 16 Aug 2026 05:29:34 +0100 It’s been the same since first edtion, and rather than correct it when it was pointed out, they wrote it into the rules to enable it –

First Edition Errata – “Page 92-93: Role of Transports.
The following paragraph will be added at the end of the rule:
If a vehicle has a transport/tow capacity, but it is not included in the Transport and Tows…[Read more]

]]> 0 2a851be4877e1eb210e6c984e4ef7721 Kar98k started the topic The Army Book listing for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL - it must be a mistake. in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/the-army-book-listing-for-the-sd-kfz-251-9-stummel-it-must-be-a-mistake/ Sun, 16 Aug 2026 03:05:42 +0100 Question: That has to be an error on page 74 in the “Armies of Germany: Third Edition” book for the SD.KFZ 251/9 STUMMEL. It says it can transport up to 8 men. Really?!

This has to be a typo, cut and paste error, or some other mistake/oversight, yes? Historically speaking, it did not carry soldiers (it was not used as a transport) because the…[Read more]

]]> 0 1a88036987995f228b14be5632935e10 D Hindley started the topic Clubbing it! Cruel Seas- Channel Dash in the forum Cruel Seas https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/clubbing-it-cruel-seas-channel-dash/ Mon, 10 Aug 2026 13:32:11 +0100 [img]https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixYpfvqK8IxpPx5SQWc4yqazEvEhwfrTXFzwqUWIJDQ4uoaMBsOhfPV3kQOb-b7EBDj-UWPZ6-TmxEweuTwArWEXrsVX9A4961GIqrD26LU8hPjxpcHoe7aTeuCu_GcqM5myp_F7iykGECXL-qrx32yAzBWWxo0jUSWreaBxinvrVkWl2HX8AZtzggfykb/s1200/P1060098.jpg[/img]

Last Thursday at the club saw me, with my usual coterie of friends,…[Read more]

]]> 0 03cd2a0ab1d81fe50b716f8e08dcc377 Szymon Pająk became a registered member https://www.warlordgames.com/activity/p/26617/ Fri, 07 Aug 2026 16:16:15 +0100 0 28933ef451e28418681d6a3197db1655 Martin became a registered member https://www.warlordgames.com/activity/p/26616/ Fri, 07 Aug 2026 16:16:14 +0100 0 f50edf074ff8c29d543ee42763506a7f CaptainMike became a registered member https://www.warlordgames.com/activity/p/26615/ Fri, 07 Aug 2026 16:16:12 +0100 0 b00770e887eb183d58c4304a4b9206cb Axeay became a registered member https://www.warlordgames.com/activity/p/26614/ Fri, 07 Aug 2026 16:16:11 +0100 0 7adafc6fecd4a10174deae79eb97c4d2 Brad Burenheide became a registered member https://www.warlordgames.com/activity/p/26613/ Fri, 07 Aug 2026 16:16:10 +0100 0 f0821dd4aca857a150f748027cae2219 Kepler became a registered member https://www.warlordgames.com/activity/p/26612/ Fri, 07 Aug 2026 16:16:08 +0100 0 a1985df6d96c106093f52d0f965fef36 Jim Ripley replied to the topic British / Canadian (1943-45) kit bash idea in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/british-canadian-1943-45-kit-bash-idea/#post-191884 Tue, 04 Aug 2026 14:30:48 +0100 I have so many prone Soviet figures ., I gave a bunch away . I think I’ve built 8 boxes of the original troops and 4 of the winter box , and 2 of the new guys .  You can only so many guys with a rifle , light MG or anti tank rifle . I borrowed panzerfaust and binocular arm pairs from my German parts box  which fit with a little sanding . Plus I…[Read more]

]]> 0 28ec18b260d6d8486d199fe541ff7f15 Kar98k replied to the topic British / Canadian (1943-45) kit bash idea in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/british-canadian-1943-45-kit-bash-idea/#post-191883 Sun, 02 Aug 2026 01:31:15 +0100 I was never fond of prone figures, but I think this was because of a bad childhood experience. When I was a kid, I bought multiple boxes of Airfix American Civil War figures. In fact, I bought all the boxes the hobby store had at the time, which were, if I can remember correctly, two boxes of Union infantry, three boxes Confederate infantry, and…[Read more]

]]> 0 762ae9d245f0e478fbe25b8d93b38a77 Jim Ripley started the topic British / Canadian (1943-45) kit bash idea in the forum Bolt Action https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/british-canadian-1943-45-kit-bash-idea/ Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:33:11 +0100 Love the new Brit plastic box but wanted a prone figure or two in my units . Went through my spares box and found 4 sprues of 8th Army figures . Now I never ordered these , they came free with my online store orders over the last couple of years . The last 2 orders I got gave me a sprue of Roman Auxiliaries and Napoleonic French .Thanks I guess ,…[Read more]

]]> 0