-
Daniel became a registered member 3 years, 2 months ago
-
Josh became a registered member 3 years, 2 months ago
-
Noah Todd Louisiana became a registered member 3 years, 2 months ago
-
Noah Todd Louisiana became a registered member 3 years, 2 months ago
-
Guillermo became a registered member 3 years, 2 months ago
-
Peter Mahon became a registered member 3 years, 2 months ago
-
Percival became a registered member 3 years, 2 months ago
-
Chris Teixeira became a registered member 3 years, 2 months ago
-
Björn Westerblom became a registered member 3 years, 2 months ago
-
Oliver became a registered member 3 years, 2 months ago
-
Benjamin Davison became a registered member 3 years, 2 months ago
-
Alexander S. replied to the topic Epic Battles – unit scale for converting battles? in the forum Pike & Shotte 3 years, 2 months ago
Hi Charge the Guns,
Thank you for your comment.
I will use this ratio now as a rule of thumb. In the past we had often the problem of scaling the units and battle field. So as you will know, you will need large tables and man models to represent such major battles.
I think it is not problem here to dobble the ration, 1:1200/ 1:600, and half…[Read more]
-
Charge The Guns replied to the topic Substantial Turf & Earth Bank in the forum Pike & Shotte 3 years, 2 months ago
Hi Tomasz – I think it makes sense that earthworks etc. have the same effect as a building if they encompass a unit rather than just being a wall. Note that as well as proving the bonus buildings also mean you can’t claim Support from units as well.
-
Charge The Guns replied to the topic Epic Battles – unit scale for converting battles? in the forum Pike & Shotte 3 years, 2 months ago
Hi Alexander, I think 600, or 300 for cavalry, would work quite nicely for standard size units in larger battles. It was common in this period to form battlefield units in standard sizes, normally having to amalgamate and split different regiments to achieve this.
In the Epic P&S rule pool they point out that what your unit represents would…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic HQs doing Snap to Attention inside a transport in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 2 months ago
The answer is simplicity & the fact that the other rules that affect troops in transports (moral & tiger fear) have been updated since BA was first released….. (tiger fear in the last couple of years)
Basically now its passive rules apply to units inside transports but active rules dont. (ok this falls down on medic saves – but I’d be happy…[Read more]
-
skymandr replied to the topic Doctor Who In Bolt Action in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 2 months ago
Great work so far! 🙂
-
SteveT replied to the topic HQs doing Snap to Attention inside a transport in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 2 months ago
From the rule book:
“Units inside transports cannot be influenced by beneficial friendly rules either, such as the morale bonus or ‘You men snap to action’ ability of an officer near the vehicle.
Officers and other HQ units can potentially ride in vehicles, and as a general rule, their special abilities do not work while they are being tra…[Read more]
-
Kassandra started the topic HQs doing Snap to Attention inside a transport in the forum Bolt Action 3 years, 2 months ago
<p style=”text-align: right;”>So I have been playing a few games and a rule doesn’t make sense in how it works. For You Men, Snap to Attention if your officer is in a transport like a half track and there is a squad inside the transport as well why can’t I issue a Order to them. They are sitting next to each other. Do officers not know how to give…[Read more]
-
TheBoltonTsar became a registered member 3 years, 2 months ago
-
TheBoltonTsar became a registered member 3 years, 2 months ago
- Load More
