-
Paul von Brand became a registered member 1 year, 7 months ago
-
Nicholas Broady became a registered member 1 year, 7 months ago
-
Master Chief replied to the topic V3: Forward Observer counts as Spotter as per p. 102, regarding being "Down"? in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
Haha yes, so we shall see whether in 3rd Ed will Warlord Games also “extrapolate” the rules for Officer and HQ Units in transport to that of Spotters in transports as well? Or will they say something else and disallow spotting from soft-skinned and open-topped vehicles?
Yes I had seen in some of the campaign books that US spotters were allowed in…[Read more]
-
Stuart Harrison replied to the topic Command vehicle special rule query in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
Most likely an intended cross reference to the only other related morale bonus, that from a nearby friendly officer.
-
the mysteron started the topic Command vehicle special rule query in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
I been trying to understand the command vehicle special rule on page 149. The sentence ( not cumulative with morale bonus, check term. and other command vehicles). I take it that this ‘check term’ is a note to a proof reader or asking you as the reader to check what the term means not a rule elsewhere in the book?
-
Nat replied to the topic V3: Forward Observer counts as Spotter as per p. 102, regarding being "Down"? in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
oh I fully agree that WL could and SHOULD have read through their own v2 FAQ and made sure that every point was covered in the rules…. but they didnt so the v3 FAQ is going to be longer than that of v2 🙁
there was a couple of spotter vehicles in the later campaign books…
My point was that spotters are only 10 points each and not locked to…[Read more]
-
Master Chief replied to the topic V3: Forward Observer counts as Spotter as per p. 102, regarding being "Down"? in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
The reason I asked is because in the 2nd Edition FAQs this is exactly the explanation given for spotters not being able to spot from transports … because officers and HQ units’ abilities do not affect units outside the transport 🤷♂️ I believe in the 2nd Edition there was only one German vehicular unit that can act as a mobile…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic V3: Forward Observer counts as Spotter as per p. 102, regarding being "Down"? in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
I’d say no, they’re not HQ units so why would they get the explict HQ allowance for seeing /working out of transports…. plus their 10 points each with multiple buffs from v2.
-
Nat replied to the topic Missing vehicles in easy army. in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
(dont worry I know what you mean …. I have a 3rd Ed metal sisters army….)
v3 was needed because of the size of the FAQ… but seen as the army books (less germany) were all v1 and the v2 rulebook lasted 12 years!
-
sunny rothfusz replied to the topic Missing vehicles in easy army. in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
Also 2,40 a month?
I can live with that.
Using the app from now on. -
sunny rothfusz replied to the topic Missing vehicles in easy army. in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
Thank you Nat.
This clears things up, as I said i’m new to the game as a former warhammer 40K refugee.
Getting sick of codexxes and rule books having a 3 year shelf life at best i looked for other games.
So sorry for jumping to the legends conclusion, it’s just past trauma.
R.I.P. Celestians , Repressor.Thank you again for clearing things up.
-
Master Chief replied to the topic V3: Forward Observer counts as Spotter as per p. 102, regarding being "Down"? in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
While on the topic of spotters, do the new 3rd Edition rules on page 147 regarding the ability of officers and other HQ units on transports mean that spotters on transports can spot? (One of the current 3rd Ed FAQs also mentioned that the spotter’s ability is a passive ability that is “always on”)
-
Nat replied to the topic Missing vehicles in easy army. in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
So Easy Army is NOT official… it used to be, but hasn’t been for the last couple of years. The official army builder is the Warlord App (found on google & apple play stores) that is behind a paywall. Easy Army is currently upto date on the major armies for v3 but the one guy who runs it is still working on updating the minor nations.
What w…[Read more]
-
sunny rothfusz started the topic Missing vehicles in easy army. in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
Hi ,
I’m pretty new to the game ( 2 full armies V3 ready but never played because it took me over 2 years to find players in Holland)
Now i found some opponents I am starting to build lists using easy army.
Seeing as the extention of easy army is WG. i take it this is a official affiliate?
But i’m missing a lot of options when it comes to our…[Read more] -
Ken Jacobsen replied to the topic Assaults in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
Good response Nat, thanks.
-
Nat replied to the topic Assaults in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
problems – after 5 seconds of thinking….
1) movement, you cant move within 1″ of another unit including friendly… so you need a 3-4″ path.. oh and you have to go round terrain, but how can you do that AND stay 1″ away from your other unit?
2) Ambush & reactions – the how and when – as if doing it sequenctially i’d get a clear shot off but…[Read more] -
Ken Jacobsen replied to the topic Assaults in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
I understand the rule for assaults, I’m asking a design philosophy question. If someone were to say “2 squads, if given a Snap To, should be able to Assault the same target simultaneously” how would you refute that statement………other than saying “that’s the rule”?
-
Stuart Harrison replied to the topic Assaults in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
The fact you complete the orders in sequence (any sequence you like) not simultaneously. You still have to see what one unit achieves before the other can start it’s assault.
-
Ken Jacobsen started the topic Assaults in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
With Assaults being much less common in v3, what’s the argument against using a Snap To order to allows 2 squads to assault simultaneously?
-
Stuart Harrison replied to the topic Roll for Vehicle Damage in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 7 months ago
There are no exceptions to the ‘natural 1 is a fail’.
You need a successful roll to damage to destroy a soft skin or open-topped armoured vehicle in close quarters, all the automatic bit does is skip the damage results charts once you’ve achieved that successful roll to damage.
- Load More
