Activity
-
Steeljackal replied to the topic Warplane Type Chart on Reference Sheets do not match Official Bolt Action Errata in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 3 months ago
1 – Strafing fighter,
2-3 – Fighter-bomber
4-5-6 – Ground-attack aircraft
Come from first edition rulesbook.
1-2 – Strafing fighter,
2-4 – Fighter-bomber
5-6 – Ground-attack aircraft
Is on second edition rulesbook. Fighterbomber is wrong.
1-2 – Strafing fighter,
3-4 – Fighter-bomber
5-6 – Ground-attack aircraft
Is corr…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Aircraft Carriers – What's the point? in the forum Victory At Sea 4 years, 3 months ago
I’d cry…. my list would need a fair bit of luck with the FAN torpedo rolls… BUT as my list is a 1943 list the teeth are pulled from that USN list (corsairs arent carrier capable, DP is half dice & Alaska isnt a valid selection) so I’d give it a go…..
-
Nat replied to the topic Commonwealth National Characteristics question in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 3 months ago
You either choice an army from the ‘armies of’ book and gain the 3 special rules, of which 1 is the free FO, OR you choice the specific commonwealth list
eg Indian army from duel in the sun removes the 3 British army rules and ONLY has the two in the duel in the sun (pg 23)
-
Nat started the topic 403 error when attempting to reply to a post in the forum General Discussion 4 years, 3 months ago
Getting a 403 access denied error when attempting to reply to a thread….
-
Nat replied to the topic Machinegun experten in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 3 months ago
Easy Army – whilest great, and recommended by warlord isnt(!) an official rules source & in fact is a single guy. There are a couple of rules issues, some are due to his interpretation (0-3 AT rifles in the soviet urban assualt platoon – EA has it as 3 not 9!) & others due to how the site is programmed (like the german MMG experten rule). So it…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Aircraft Carriers – What's the point? in the forum Victory At Sea 4 years, 3 months ago
RE: Kumano’s refit – Oh well thats what happens when you use BS and dont double check..meh :p …saves 30 points… thats 2 more bettys :p
Type 93 torpedoes with their extra range are a lot easier to use as 17″ is short range (+0)… but yeah at long range they become hard to use, and at extreme range almost impossible.
The basic stragergy for…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Commissioned date discrepancies in the forum Victory At Sea 4 years, 3 months ago
yeah… the refits could do with i) being clearer
ii) being proof read… I mean seriously the whole book should have been…I have a ‘small’ spreadsheet of over 200 issues with the stats blocks (missing info, blatenly wrong numbers, doubled up refits etc etc), & I gave up!
iii) dont even get me or enoich started on the points….. -
Nat replied to the topic Defensive fire (tank, armored car, etc.) question in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 3 months ago
Also the attacking unit must be over 6″ away or not have a rule that prevents reactionary fire, & must be in arc (if the weapon /team has the fixed rule)…
-
Steeljackal replied to the topic Defensive fire (tank, armored car, etc.) question in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 3 months ago
Same rules as infantry.
If target unit has not already taken an order in that turn, then can react opening fire.
-
Nat replied to the topic British National Characteristic Question in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 3 months ago
Up and at ’em It you dont have AT grenades.. its a mute point because you arent going to destroy the tank… if you do have AT grenades its a mute point as you dont take the tank fear test anyway…
Blood Curdling Charge; as said in the FAQ, its treated like being within 6″ of the target… so units in ambush still get to fire.
-
Nat replied to the topic Aircraft Carriers – What's the point? in the forum Victory At Sea 4 years, 3 months ago
the Mogami refit brings another 4 aircraft for scouting, and as the turrets bearly do anything for me the aircraft are a better propersition :p
re the Kumano – going off memory (& BattleScribe) as books at homeone of them gets its radar & +1 AA a year earlier than the other… its basically the Radar trait that the list is after.
-
Nat replied to the topic Commissioned date discrepancies in the forum Victory At Sea 4 years, 3 months ago
Just to append Enioch’s point:
If playing pickup games /non historical scenarios then you just take the names as sub-classes as there is no restrictions to only 1 of a name.
So for example the Mogami class heavy cruiser class had 4 ships, but you are not limited to only having 4 in your fleet. Only one of them had a massive refit that removed…[Read more]
-
Charge The Guns started the topic Auldearn 1645 – The Game in the forum Pike & Shotte 4 years, 3 months ago
<p class=”p1″>My latest blog post covers the Auldearn 1645 game that The Friends of General Haig played at Warlord Game’s Open Day. A hard fought game which went down to the last turn of the day. More pictures, and to see the result, visit: https://theviaregia.blogspot.com/2021/09/auldearn-1645-game.html</p>




-
Steeljackal replied to the topic US Chaplain selfmade in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 4 months ago
Another pics
-
Steeljackal started the topic US Chaplain selfmade in the forum Bolt Action 4 years, 4 months ago
Warlordgames US and German pieces modified by cutting, filling and engraving plus some green-stuff
-
Nat replied to the topic Aircraft Carriers – What's the point? in the forum Victory At Sea 4 years, 4 months ago
About poor rolls, thats why we say if you are going carriers you must go all in on the scouting table (or deploy everything and hope to get the needed flights off in game).
Now the list above I’ve used once against an opponent (and a few times against my other fleet to see how it works) and 7 SP is very very bad rolling
-
Charge The Guns replied to the topic Auldearn 1645 – The Armies in the forum Pike & Shotte 4 years, 4 months ago
Thanks, IO, much appreciated 😀
-
Nat replied to the topic Regimental Artillery in the forum Black Powder 4 years, 4 months ago
re move & fire, depends if you are using the optional rules of 2+ moves means unable to fire. If your not then yeah so long as you give the order of move to X and fire then I cant recall a reason why not.
Yes the Batteries are independant units, they dont require limbering but thats the only exception that i can think of.
-
Nat replied to the topic Aircraft Carriers – What's the point? in the forum Victory At Sea 4 years, 4 months ago
Example list that I used last game: – Year 1943 (-THIS IS IMPORTANT! personally this is the most balanced,,, pre 42 Allies struggle post 43 then the axis will due to refits and flights available)
Akagi, 8 A6M5 Zero Fighters, 9 x Jill Torpedo Bombers – 250
Shokaku, 1942 refit, 9 A6M5 zeros Fs, 9 x Jill TBs – 280
6 x Betty TBs (land based) -…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic Aircraft Carriers – What's the point? in the forum Victory At Sea 4 years, 4 months ago
Ok Radar Trait (sorry dont have the page number), they add +1 to the scouting roll (so instead of needing a 5+ for the SP its a 4+) it also allows you to re-roll failed rolls… Advanced Radar add +2 instead.
Not all DDs have Radar Trait, some add it as a refit so you need to look hard – for example with the Japanese only the Yugumo starts with…[Read more]
- Load More
