-
Stuart Harrison replied to the topic Question on US Armored platoon Recon Jeep in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
According to AoUS (p78), the reconnaissance jeep doesn’t have an upgrade option, just the MMG. The airborne armoured jeep comes with HMG as standard.
-
Bart Garey started the topic Question on US Armored platoon Recon Jeep in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
- Shouldn’t a recon jeep in armored platoon be able to upgrade to HMG? Plus the jeep in Recon platoon is for transport. Wondering if the Recon platoon could also take a Recon Jeep (mmg) in addition to transport jeep? Thank you.
-
Orlunu replied to the topic Rules Questions in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
Hi, just registered an account to ask people about a rules issue. I can’t find it being discussed before. Basically, the issue we’re running into as a few of us have started picking up BA is that we keep encountering problems where the Transport Vehicles & Tows rule in Force Selection (p.183)… doesn’t seem to work at all.
“If a vehicle listed…[Read more]
-
L.T. Russell replied to the topic The FG42 in Bolt Action, and how easy it is to fix the error. in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
Still comes down to what kinda round does it fire. Assault rifles fire a reduced-length rifle cartridge. Automatic rifles fire a full-length rifle round….
-
Michael replied to the topic The FG42 in Bolt Action, and how easy it is to fix the error. in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
Page 20-21 split between
-
Michael replied to the topic The FG42 in Bolt Action, and how easy it is to fix the error. in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
The FG42 has a barrel 100mm shorter than a Kar 98 and 110mm shorter than a BAR. Do you think it may effect range? Also it kicked like a mule and was hard to control in full auto. Find a 8mm mauser with a 500mm barrel that shoots well over 400.The need for the fancy muzzle break/flash hider leads me to believe it also had alot of unburned powder at…[Read more]
-
Lennart became a registered member 1 year ago
-
Orlunu became a registered member 1 year ago
-
William became a registered member 1 year ago
-
Paul McConnell became a registered member 1 year ago
-
Stuart Harrison replied to the topic M24 Chaffee riveted? in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
Same effect as last time, just this time the author forgot to change the wording for the reason when cutting and pasting from the M3 Stuart entry. AoUS first edition wording for the M24 ‘Vulnerable’ rule was “Vulnerable: because of it’s light armour, all shots to the side and rear of the vehicle get an additional +1 penetration modifier (ie, in…[Read more]
-
Witch Racer started the topic M24 Chaffee riveted? in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
The entry in the Armies of the United States says that the M24 is riveted this is incorrect. Even V3 gives it light armour still +1 penetration but fully welded.
-
Stuart Harrison replied to the topic Rules Questions in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
@Wolfy,
Looks to be a supplement author goof mentioning Ambush when it’s not applicable.
The same rule in AoUS (Sherman Calliope, p63, and USMC International M2-4 Rocket Truck, p75) has deleted the bit in brackets, and with it any mention of Ambush.
-
Wolfy replied to the topic Rules Questions in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
Multiple launchers:
Stationary firing platform: You can fire from ambush
Indirect fire: You cannot fire from ambush
Which one is it?
-
John Secker replied to the topic Where is the Sdkfz 250/11 in v3? in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
Aha! Thanks for this. So they class it as an Armoured Car rather than as a Transport, which is nonsense, given its role specifically as a Platoon Leader’s transport vehicle. And I have now found it in the app – it is only available if I take an Armoured platoon, I can’t add it as a transport vehicle in an Infantry platoon. Which is weird, because…[Read more]
-
Bob Philip replied to the topic Down troops and objectives in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
Ah thanks guys, was just wondering if I had missed somehing.
-
Stuart Harrison replied to the topic Down troops and objectives in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 1 month ago
I’m pretty sure you can’t see it because there isn’t such a rule, and hasn’t been in either of the two previous editions to the best of my memory. Next time someone tells you there is, place the onus on them to show you the rule (and please do come back to share if he can show you one).
They may be getting confused with the Demolition mission,…[Read more]
-
Stuart Harrison replied to the topic Where is the Sdkfz 250/11 in v3? in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 1 month ago
AoG, p85, It’s in the Armoured Cars part of the army list with the 250/10. Making the 250/11 requires taking one of the options, so you might only see the 250/10 in the app.
-
Kar98k replied to the topic Down troops and objectives in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 1 month ago
Where in the rules does it say they can’t?
Now, there might be a special scenario rule where it says they can’t, but according the to core rules, units (infantry and artillery) with a down order can capture/hold/deny an objective.
-
Kar98k replied to the topic The FG42 in Bolt Action, and how easy it is to fix the error. in the forum Bolt Action 1 year, 1 month ago
That chart is taken from that book.
Which page?
What we are saying is to avoid over-reliance on a single source of information, it is crucial to consult a variety of credible sources, then assemble the facts.
Side Note: Let us look at how incorrect information was published about the performance of German aircraft used in The Great War…[Read more]
- Load More
