Kepler

I feel like the obvious and reasonable compromise would be that if a FLAK unit is on ambush, it can fire at any drop/jump units deploying via flight, within its range, while still ‘in the air’. I can accept it being a little more restrictive than firing at aircraft, but if I have a set of autocannons literally primed as air defenses, it’s a little…[Read more]

I really do wish it was all truly the same scale. It’s especially annoying for me when they’re inconsistent with armaments; two vehicles will have the same gun but it’s visibly much larger on one model because it was designed to emphasize the gunner, at infantry scale. And like you noted, I prefer to assemble all of my tanks with hatches closed…[Read more]

Sorry, that was entirely a tangent. It is, of course, completely correct to note that the forward facing machine gun should be coaxial rather than pintle-mounted, but this is nevertheless a huge nerf to the capability of the vehicle. Being able to shoot both the howitzer and a forward machine gun in the same turn made it very strong for its cost,…[Read more]

I believe they only have the one kit, but with multiple assembly options. I built mine with the bench seats to emphasize its role as a transport vehicle in my army list (which I’ve since removed, since they nerfed it in the errata), but the vehicle can be built with space for them.

I’d like to reiterate I’m not arguing with you about the correct…[Read more]

Regardless of historical accuracy, this is very clearly an intentional decision, as the rulebook entry for the 251/9 is exactly the same as the 250/8 on the preceding page, save for the addition of transport capacity. As for the model itself, the only reason we couldn’t fit 8 men inside would be the discrepancy between infantry and vehicle scale…[Read more]