<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Warlord Games | East Norfolks | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community-members/eastnorfolks/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community-members/eastnorfolks/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for East Norfolks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 12:17:42 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9f81ebb3e26d7a1fc05c115fa2977e0e</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks started the topic Shrapnel in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/shrapnel/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 12:44:36 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can shrapnel be used at long range? Clash of Eagles (p107) says yes (2 dice) but Epic Battles (p174) only mentions medium range (3 dice).</p>
<p>Also, can howitzers fire shrapnel?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8975f601a81e17ee0f4fb8dd4cd8501b</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic French Old Guard too strong? in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/french-old-guard-too-strong/#post-188735</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2023 12:58:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Al</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback.</p>
<p>I may well have got some of this wrong &#8211; hence my questions to the forum.  However, please remember this was purely a very simple theoretical question on a 1:1 scenario of British Guard in line vs French Old Guard in column.  I totally accept that in a full game there is much more you can do (as Mike points o&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-22119"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/french-old-guard-too-strong/#post-188735" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">733c967349def415211a098187b5c907</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic Cavalry formations in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/cavalry-formations/#post-188733</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2023 12:17:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI &#8211; just worked out what this is about.  The Epic Battles rule set has a new rule for French cavalry &#8211; &#8220;Cavalry Column of Attack&#8221;.  Sorry &#8211; bit slow to realise this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ba6e015dd7b3f4f94da7eab0add15a18</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic French Old Guard too strong? in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/french-old-guard-too-strong/#post-188731</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2023 11:49:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks for the comments &#8211; good to know I wasn&#8217;t doing anything wrong technically!</p>
<p>I actually started looking at this issue after re-reading a thread from last year on large units where we concluded that a large British Guard unit technically had the stats 9/5/3+/5, which seemed really powerful especially when paired with First Fire and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-22116"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/french-old-guard-too-strong/#post-188731" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1c5a1d363cdcfb0bda79b2ff8fbed843</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks started the topic French Old Guard too strong? in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/french-old-guard-too-strong/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2023 23:17:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been play testing numerous times a very simple scenario of a French Old Guard infantry battalion (standard size unit in Attack Column) charging a British Guard infantry battalion (large size unit in line).  The French win virtually every time!  Is this correct?</p>
<p>I have the British stats at a seemingly very powerful 9/5/3+/5 with First F&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-22112"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/french-old-guard-too-strong/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6877b29ac7536d5fa41fdf8deaefd252</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic charge distance in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/charge-distance/#post-188720</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 15:33:41 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding is, yes.  You initiate the charge process by giving a command in the Command phase.  Para 1 of page 30 says “we don’t worry whether it is possible to enact the charge at this stage”.</p>
<p>Note, a charge process can have several moves (up to 3) but only the move that brings them into base contact is the actual charge move &#8211; second&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-22103"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/charge-distance/#post-188720" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">58315edbe88e7c705289571df61afd8b</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic BP2 - clear shot in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/bp2-clear-shot/#post-188390</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 17:51:26 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Garry &#8211; yes what you (and CTG) say all makes a lot of common sense. Will have to think through my house rules a bit further…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">834f04d2f893d138cab326dc8f9a0995</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic BP2 - clear shot in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/bp2-clear-shot/#post-188388</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:30:43 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply as always Garry but I&#8217;m even more confused now!</p>
<p>I follow the maths but I&#8217;m not sure what your final interpretation of the rules is?  What would you do in this situtation?</p>
<p>I really like BP2 and try not to get too bogged down by the technicalities (although I clearly fail on this sometimes) but I really wish these situations&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-16200"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/bp2-clear-shot/#post-188388" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">07b95724d309dda9fbc25d15ecc13f69</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic BP2 - clear shot in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/bp2-clear-shot/#post-188015</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:34:14 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks CTG &#8211; very helpful.  I wish the rules were clearer on these types of situations but your house rule does seem a sensible solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">767d8b70c040c4d91056126779073f32</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic BP2 - clear shot in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/bp2-clear-shot/#post-188013</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 11:40:40 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks for the reply CTG.</p>
<p>Whilst I think your point makes a lot of common sense, I always struggle with this scenario as it is not what the main BP2 rules actually say.</p>
<p>P45 states &#8220;a unit’s ability to see is always judged from the centre of the unit’s front rank&#8221; and the diagram at the bottom of P47 says the shot is only &#8220;not clear&#8221; whe&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-14601"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/bp2-clear-shot/#post-188013" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">af5cb8527d400b20a7c9024211c33b40</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks started the topic BP2 - clear shot in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/bp2-clear-shot/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 14:08:48 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all</p>
<p>Is my reasoning for a clear shot correct (see attached pic)?</p>
<ol>
<li>Is there a clear line of sight from the centre of the red unit frontage to any point on the blue unit?  YES</li>
<li>Is blue unit is in range?  YES</li>
<li>Is the blue unit the nearest clear target? YES</li>
<li>Can at least half of the blue unit be seen from the centre of the red unit’s fro&hellip;</li>
</ol>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-14593"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/bp2-clear-shot/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b9c41e51b2e2bf2670bbd745c4ade6e4</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic Cavalry formations in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/cavalry-formations/#post-187618</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:37:42 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Garry.  That&#8217;s what I thought but then saw the attached section of the new Epic Battle rules showing Cavalry as an Attack Column.  Any ideas what this means?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b4537d4207a13a117c65c74ab87ecd16</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks started the topic Cavalry formations in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/cavalry-formations/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:26:19 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe a silly question but can cavalry form Attack Columns?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b6484634181442f0bd401c615fd535c2</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic About Face in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/about-face/#post-187473</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 22:16:07 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks both.  Sorry to keep coming up with these technical points but at least your discussion above shows I wasn&#8217;t being slow on the uptake and that it is, in fact, not completely clear!</p>
<p>As per my initial post, I was also looking at the rule on page 36.  My thought now is that, strictly by the wording of the rules, you can reverse each base of t&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-13956"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/about-face/#post-187473" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d067726211fb1972c5215919408e7b69</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks started the topic About Face in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/about-face/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 14:09:44 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello all &#8211; quick question on movement.</p>
<p>The rules allow units to “About Face” 180 degrees (p36) but what is the movement deduction for this, if any?</p>
<p>If I have a line facing due north but want to wheel it to face south-west (say an enemy unit suddenly appears coming round the flank and rear) , do you:</p>
<p>(a) assume the whole line wheels 135 deg&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-13950"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/about-face/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">96fbe0c6dd3e6cf0ea63c1ddd7b945cd</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic Main BP2 rulebook v Epic Battle rulebook in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/main-bp2-rulebook-v-epic-battle-rulebook/page/2/#post-187362</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 23:51:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Al &#8211; I agree with most of what you say except &#8220;all Unclear Target does is excuse you from shooting at the closest target&#8221;.  This is not quite correct &#8211; it also gives you a -1 to hit modifier which can be important, especially in decisive moments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">05d2ca4a6d7e946808847e6420491f77</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic Main BP2 rulebook v Epic Battle rulebook in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/main-bp2-rulebook-v-epic-battle-rulebook/#post-187360</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 16:22:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Al</p>
<p>I guess on the Unclear Targets I&#8217;m basically asking whether to assess &#8220;less than half&#8221; on frontage or area, as there may theoretically be some situations where the frontage is less than half but clearly the mass of the unit is within the FoF.  However, I accept it is quite a pedantic point I&#8217;m making and I should probably just take the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-13857"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/main-bp2-rulebook-v-epic-battle-rulebook/#post-187360" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d691c9d8c8eb2e07407e44b5e70ab693</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic Main BP2 rulebook v Epic Battle rulebook in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/main-bp2-rulebook-v-epic-battle-rulebook/#post-187357</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 15:24:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Garry &#8211; all clear now I think.</p>
<p>Just to complete the discussion, attached is a pic of the &#8220;FoF&#8221; in EB.  Implies, I believe, 18&#8243; measured from any point on the formation frontage.  How this is consistent with the same rules saying to measure from the leader base is beyond me.</p>
<p>Anyway, as mentioned I&#8217;m going to ignore all this and stick to t&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-13855"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/main-bp2-rulebook-v-epic-battle-rulebook/#post-187357" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">362a61dbf7466c362f0e76048be37a4b</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic Main BP2 rulebook v Epic Battle rulebook in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/main-bp2-rulebook-v-epic-battle-rulebook/#post-187354</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:13:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys – really appreciate the input.</p>
<p>I agree with a lot of what you say but I do think that EB has “changed” the rules, at least in respect of range measurement.  As per the diagram below from p41 of EB, it is clearly being measured from the corners of the Leader Base.</p>
<p>That said, this thread has really helped me refine my thoughts and I&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-13850"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/main-bp2-rulebook-v-epic-battle-rulebook/#post-187354" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">96fe29f22d925846e9899d0b75a459b6</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic Main BP2 rulebook v Epic Battle rulebook in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/main-bp2-rulebook-v-epic-battle-rulebook/#post-187341</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 18:48:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks Garry &#8211; as always, very helpful.</p>
<p>Also, I just realised that (somewhat ironically!) I was not precise enough in my own language.  When I referred to &#8220;Leader Model&#8221; I meant &#8220;Leader Base&#8221; i.e. one of the four bases of a standard unit in EB, not the actual leader mini figure itself.  Nevertheless the differences remain and EB still r&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-13838"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/main-bp2-rulebook-v-epic-battle-rulebook/#post-187341" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9f731beed95302e2f48b866cf24466ff</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks started the topic Main BP2 rulebook v Epic Battle rulebook in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/main-bp2-rulebook-v-epic-battle-rulebook/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:44:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello all</p>
<p>I’ve recently got a copy of the A5 Epic Battle (EB) rules and compared them to the main Black Powder 2 (BP2) rules that I already have and noticed a few differences that are really confusing me, as follows:</p>
<p><strong>Visibility.</strong>  The diagram on p39 of EB shows visibility being measured from any point on the frontage of the Leader model.  The dia&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-13835"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/main-bp2-rulebook-v-epic-battle-rulebook/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ed6be3ff9e09e8975df295f84248d152</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic BP2 - re-rolls in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/bp2-re-rolls/#post-186568</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 14:27:01 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK thanks &#8211; yes I think I will continue to use the Advance Rules for Generals, seems much more engaging way to play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">45949e31a518e563ff8373234b79b603</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic BP2 - re-rolls in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/bp2-re-rolls/#post-186565</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:10:00 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always thanks Big Al</p>
<p>Personally I think the rules for re-rolling could be a little clearer (especially for a relative newbie like me).  However, your explanation makes perfect sense and I shall follow accordingly.</p>
<p>When you say <em>&#8220;If you want to use the SR of the General, then it is he who must issue the order in the first place&#8221; </em>I am assuming&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8762"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/bp2-re-rolls/#post-186565" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e95abad949d0ee19499360d085a98155</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks started the topic BP2 - re-rolls in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/bp2-re-rolls/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 12:11:36 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello all</p>
<p>A few questions on re-rolls:</p>
<p>-When a general with a SR of 9 joins a brigade commander with a SR of 8, do you use 9 for the re-roll?</p>
<p>-If you are re-rolling using a general with a SR of 9 and you are ordering a unit with the Reliable rule, would that make the re-roll order a 10?</p>
<p>-If the general has joined a brigade commander for a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8760"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/bp2-re-rolls/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">253645cb79060ed78ae19b6069899521</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic Large unit stats in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/large-unit-stats/#post-186532</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:26:00 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all for your comments &#8211; appreciated. Will have to give this a bit of thought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2d4afb2d7cfef002106d8a6340942f2a</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic Large unit stats in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/large-unit-stats/#post-186524</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:28:09 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Garry &#8211; I see your point.  To make it even more complicated, I&#8217;ve just noticed that on page 160 of the main rules in the scenario section, Guards units (although generic not specifically British) are listed as 7/3/3+/3 with special rules of Elite 4+ and reliable.</p>
<p>I wish that, when the writers of the rules and supplements amend basic&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8689"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/large-unit-stats/#post-186524" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dcc1c844f81edd3be387e34fc8e32c2f</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic Large unit stats in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/large-unit-stats/#post-186517</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 22:04:31 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Big Al &#8211; this is helpful.  Yes, maybe you are right &#8211; just stick with the main rules.  Therefore:</p>
<p>Foot Guards  = 8/4/3+/4 plus Reliable and Elite 3+  (I like the way this compares to the French Old Guard stats as well &#8211; very even)</p>
<p>52nd/large battalion = 8/4/4+/4</p>
<p>Standard battalion = 6/3/4+/3</p>
<p>This seems about right.</p>
<p>Good point on the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8677"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/large-unit-stats/#post-186517" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7cff13df683b30571e9cc5806a244537</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks started the topic Large unit stats in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/large-unit-stats/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:02:40 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evening all</p>
<p>Question on unit classification for anyone who knows how the BP2 rules and AT2 supplement interact.</p>
<p>Should the British 1/52nd at Waterloo be considered a large unit (they had over 1,100 men)?  If so (I would have thought yes), what stats should it have for H2H/Shooting/Morale/Stamina?</p>
<p>A standard light battalion is meant to be&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8674"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/large-unit-stats/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5a49b63caf848527c6648b9f1e5bb5e4</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic Further BP2 queries in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/further-bp2-queries/#post-186271</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 21:19:20 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent thanks Garry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d8fe656857685b9728d710424753891d</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic Further BP2 queries in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/further-bp2-queries/#post-186269</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:32:36 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks both. Sorry to labour the point but just to be completely clear. So a foot battery can limber, do one move, unlimber and shoot all in one Turn, provided has an order for three movies. Correct?</p>
<p>Agree with all your other points on horse artillery and shrapnel. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f01b75849707a4d2e24e4b1a5d8e5e2c</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks started the topic Further BP2 queries in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/further-bp2-queries/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:22:33 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few more queries for anyone that can help:</p>
<p>-British rocket troop.  What stamina is it?  Is it the same as horse artillery?</p>
<p>-Foot artillery movement.  I’ve seen a few threads on this but not sure of the final conclusion.  Under the main BP2 rules (not supplements/house rules) can a foot artillery unit with a successful order for three Moves&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8193"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/further-bp2-queries/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9d74d8682fbabb997774758243c43e2d</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic Proximity rule and formation changes in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/proximity-rule-and-formation-changes/#post-186261</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:37:32 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Big Al &#8211; clear now and also clarifies my earlier question on forming squares.  Good point on the -1 when not using initiative &#8211; easy to forget that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bbdd20410d0b15b8ed86bcc665363d95</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic Proximity rule and formation changes in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/proximity-rule-and-formation-changes/#post-186259</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 10:45:31 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank Garry</p>
<p>This is really helpful as always.  Having looked again, I agree with you.</p>
<p>Given both the Initiative Order and Proximity Rule are relevant if within 12” of enemy, it must follow that if you are allowed to change formation under Initiative Orders, you must also be able to under the Proximity Rule, or it wouldn’t make any sens&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8190"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/proximity-rule-and-formation-changes/#post-186259" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cfa3ba7be8d742d06f254664dd4e95da</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks started the topic Proximity rule and formation changes in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/proximity-rule-and-formation-changes/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:57:40 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello all</p>
<p>Brief question on formation changes under the Proximity rule as I have seen differing comments on this.</p>
<p>My understanding is that is not allowed.  You are only allowed to do a Move forward keeping entirely within your front quarter (or similar back into your rear quarter).  This means that you can change direction e.g. pivot to face a d&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8187"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/proximity-rule-and-formation-changes/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">be0dc3e43e1c0925e42586646deb3e56</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks replied to the topic French Napoleonic artillery in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/french-napoleonic-artillery/#post-185240</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:58:19 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that.</p>
<p>I think this means both are &#8220;standard&#8221; size but a British 9dr battery is classed as normal &#8220;foot&#8221; (with a range of 48&#8243;) and a French 8 gun 12 pdr battery can be classed as &#8220;heavy&#8221; (with a range of 60&#8243;, like siege).  I guess this would make sense as it gives the French an advantage of 2 dice from 30&#8243; rather than at 24&#8243;.  Is this correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">37de0e491575bd0d117dac65dedbc845</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks started the topic French Napoleonic artillery in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/french-napoleonic-artillery/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:20:37 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all – I am new to Black Powder but really enjoying playing it with my 15mm Napoleonics. Quick question that is bugging me though – how is the firepower of a French 8 gun 12 pdr artillery company reflected versus the firepower of a British 6 gun 9 pdr company? Surely there must be a difference but I can’t find it – sorry for the dumb newbie&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7258"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/french-napoleonic-artillery/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e3e33a83c122a49a373977bdbcca4308</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/activity/p/7131/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 08:36:27 +0100</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6c7b4c43d0b4763e6a0cea3e40ce0858</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/activity/p/7118/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:02:02 +0100</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f0de1a4a7ced8a2f7d25b3f013b20348</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/activity/p/7117/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:00:54 +0100</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9ea1cc55d7b55e5497256316ddc7848f</guid>
				<title>East Norfolks&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/activity/p/7116/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:58:35 +0100</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>