Activity
-
Nat replied to the topic Initial Broadside(s)? in the forum Black Seas 6 months, 2 weeks ago
[quote: pg 34]
The first time a ship shoots with either of its broadsides (not bow or stern guns) in a game
[/quote]highlighted the word either – this means the first time you fire a broadside it gets the bonus the second broadside (position) to fire wont get it
-
Nat replied to the topic Armies of Great Britain V3 in the forum Bolt Action 6 months, 2 weeks ago
Osprey release date is 31st July… so about then!
-
George replied to the topic Glory Hallelujah Skirmish Question in the forum Black Powder 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Ah, I see that now in my BPv1 Rule Book. I’ll keep it as a house rule. Thank you for your reply.
-
George started the topic Glory Hallelujah Skirmish Question in the forum Black Powder 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Hello again,
Interesting, I have been updating the Black Powder Quick Reference chart with Glory Hallelujah American Civil War supplemental rules.
I found something that needs clarification
In Glory Hallelujah page 58 it says under skirmishers “We tend to only use the +1 modifier for skirmish fire when skirmishers fire on formed, close order…[Read more]
-
George replied to the topic Another BP rules clarification in the forum Black Powder 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Thank you, Nate. I thought so but wanted to be sure.
-
Nat replied to the topic Another BP rules clarification in the forum Black Powder 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Yes it does…
The only way to give a disordered unit any order is to make the units Elite Roll… it to show that if the rank & file are running round like headless chickens it doesnt matter what you shout they aint listening!
-
George started the topic Charge and Leader Questions in the forum Black Powder 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Hello again,
So I have a charge questions about charging:
1. A unit is given an order to charge an enemy that it is also close enough to shoot. The unit moves, survives closing fire, and moves into contact during the enemy. The melee is resolved during the hand-to-hand phase.
a. I take it the charging unit cannot shoot before charging as it is…[Read more]
-
George started the topic Another BP rules clarification in the forum Black Powder 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Thanks to Nate and Ben for replying to my earlier questions.
Here is another that came up.
A disorganized unit cannot receive orders. Does this include the rally order?
-
George replied to the topic Need some BP rules clarifications in the forum Black Powder 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Thank you, Ben 🙂
-
George replied to the topic Need some BP rules clarifications in the forum Black Powder 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Thank you for your response. However, #1 is still unclear. Yes, order before movement however the rules give specifics about these moves, namely: 1. An AC moves up to 12″ to join a BC at the start of the command phase before the BC issues his orders. 2. The rally order is the last order given and a BC moves up to 12″ to join him.
The question is,…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Need some BP rules clarifications in the forum Black Powder 6 months, 3 weeks ago
1) orders before movement…
2) in v1 Army Commanders could order Brigades… some wording wasnt updated.. but yes in v2 they cant directly order a brigade unless you house rule it
3) terrain, like units, is abstracted in the core rules (not sure about the epic versions) so discuss /come to a concencouse in your group how you want them…[Read more]
-
George started the topic Need some BP rules clarifications in the forum Black Powder 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Hi, I have been away from BP for a while now I’m getting back into it. Replaying a game and came up with some rules questions:
1. An army general(AC) can only help a brigade commander(BC) re-roll a failed roll. A BC wants to rally a unit and have the AG support him. Let’s see if I’m doing this right. The AG moves into contact, up to 12″, with the…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Hungary Needs Some Loving in the forum Bolt Action 7 months ago
They are NOT in the worst state… thats the Chinese factionS (!)
But yes, WL didnt check the pdfs before posting them…. the whole army lists feel rushed and ALL should have been revised. (but then again as so much of the v2 FAQ wasnt included in the v3 rulebook and the v3 errata reverses rules that are in the main rulebook (MLRS & passengers…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Rules Questions in the forum Bolt Action 7 months ago
see my post 190921 (pg34 of this thread)… but RAW = No, GAP (Game As Played) Yes
-
Nat replied to the topic Question on Squadron Lettering in the forum Blood Red Skies 7 months ago
RAF … it was down to the maintenance crew…
https :// http://www.rafweb.org/ Squadrons/ Sqn%20Markings/ sqn_codes.htm
(remove spaces after / ‘s)
but basically
- Code letters. Code letters are carried by Service types in operational units and operational training units. The two Code letters and one letter to indicate individual aircraft are t…
-
Nat replied to the topic Line of Battle in the forum Black Seas 7 months, 3 weeks ago
a battle line is calculated at the start of the turn.
You use the lowest level of sails/ speed ship as the speed of the line
You use the position of the last ship in the line for working out where the whole line is in the wind gauge
You move the line from the lead shipthe whole line moves as a single element in regards to the wind gauge. …[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Shrapnel in the forum Black Powder 7 months, 3 weeks ago
If playing using the v1 supplements – yes
If playing epic – no… epic is just the epic rulebook (AFAIK – dont have the epic rules, but they way they are protrayed is that they are in place of having to buy the supplements) -
Nat replied to the topic Bases ? in the forum Blood Red Skies 8 months ago
https :// store.warlordgames.com / products / blood-red-skies-advantage-flying-stand-pack
remove the spaces
-
Nat replied to the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 8 months, 1 week ago
after more feedback and differences in how people read stuff another wardroom file.
-
invisible officer replied to the topic BazookaPanzerfaust shape charge weapons in the forum Bolt Action 8 months, 4 weeks ago
BA is not an exact reprentation of real WW II. Just a fun game. For Panterfaust 150 the German forces had a Splitterring that could be fixed and
made it into an Anti Personal weapon.
Similar got used on the Stielhandgranate to change that blast weapon into a splinter one.
Other shaped charge eapons had an anti personal option t…[Read more]
- Load More
