Activity
-
Nat replied to the topic Soviet Dog Mines in the forum Bolt Action 10 months, 3 weeks ago
One-shot weapon: Means it can only be used once per game, it allows you to choose if to use it when doing a fire or advance action.
Now IIRC (away from my rulebook) they still have their old to hit chart. This means no other to hit modifiers happen. As its a hit against the DV of the vehicle and NOT a facing cover wont apply! however its not…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Free Moves in the forum Black Powder 11 months ago
Only the one he failed with on.
The other units never get the chance to be given an order so how can they do at least 1 move of that order? Its like when you give orders to your first brigade commander the timing for instictive orders has passed so you cant then have a unit carry one out.
-
Nat started the topic What am I thinking! in the forum Black Seas 11 months, 1 week ago
So … I always like the idea of a complete formation rather than just a few units…
And I like the idea of sailing boats
Plus for some strange reason I end up playing Russians in every historical system!which means the MADNESS of the Russian Fleet in the Eastern Med 1805-1807…. all 42 ships! (16 being 2nd and 3rd rates)… But has the upside…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Light vs Medium Machine Guns in the forum Bolt Action 11 months, 3 weeks ago
pretty much yes.
LMG, 2 man crew, inside a squad
MMG, 3 man crew, fixed weapon, a unit in its own right. -
Nat replied to the topic HE on multiple units / pin in the forum Bolt Action 11 months, 4 weeks ago
IF (and its a big if) multiple units are hit by a HE template then yes all units hit will receive the pins.
Note you roll the D2/D3 for each unit.
Example a 4″ HE hits a unit of 3 models, you place the center between 2 of the models making sure that all 3 are hit by the template (so meeting the requirements for placing the template) and you…[Read more]
-
Nat replied to the topic Command Vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 12 months ago
Now things that WL DONT say … is can you take 2 (or more) command vehicles in a single platoon… Or are you limited to 1 only?
How do command vehicles that are transports work in regards to infantry platoon commanders who are limited to 1 per platoon? Are they allowed in addition, do they replace the need for the platoon commander or cant be taken? -
Nat replied to the topic Contesting no LOS objectives in the forum Bolt Action 12 months ago
You have 3 states of objective in Bolt Action
Unclaimed
Secured (completely controlled by one side or other)
Contested (aka un-secured but predominently controlled by one side or other) -
Nat replied to the topic Contesting no LOS objectives in the forum Bolt Action 12 months ago
Contesting is another way of saying that your forces havent secured the objective completely.
The problem is actually WHAT is the objective other than just a marker /made up game point – a VIP… well someone /something that can bump them off would be a problem to the securing unit
A cross roads – a single person with a grenade can block it by…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic Contesting no LOS objectives in the forum Bolt Action 12 months ago
Yes, if LoS is not mentioned in the relavent rules for taking, holding or contesting objectives then there is no LoS requirements.
Although its worth noting that in some senarios vehicles can contest by not take or hold objectives.
-
Nat replied to the topic Command Vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
French have at least one… which is a soft skin with zero transport capacity.
-
Nat replied to the topic Command Vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
@Stuart – fair…. shows how much I use it :p (to wit – I dont… normally forget which tank IS my command vehicle!)
@capt Scarlett – cant find it now 🙁 … wondering if it was a Warlord one now :/
-
Nat replied to the topic Command Vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
They cant receive orders from platoon commaders, as they count as platoon commanders for issuing and receiving orders, but can from company officers. (pg 149 and 113)
As a comander they CAN give their +1 morale to infantry… (there’s nothing stating that they are limited to giving morale to vehicles so therefore the default rules of morale being…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic Command Vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
Eg my current Soviet platoon is
1 x T60
2 x BT7
1 x T34/85None of these have the command vehicle option so I have to upgrade one of them to be the platoon commander for +10 points.
-
Nat replied to the topic Command Vehicles in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
So this isnt very clear in the rulebook BUT was clarified on Facebook & in one of the articles …
For armoured pltns:
If you include a vehicle that has the command vehicle trait then they are automatically the platoon commander.
If you dont have a command vehicle in your list you MUST upgrade ONE to be a command vehicle even if it doesnt…[Read more] -
Nat replied to the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 1 year ago
Updated VMF file…
& updated wardroom errata which adds a few ships to existing nations…
-
Nat replied to the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 1 year ago
Despite the name, this is a balance pickup game checksheet
You can choose which of the entries you dont want to use when organising your game /tournament.
-
Nat replied to the topic News from the Wardroom! in the forum Victory At Sea 1 year ago
2nd part of the points chart
posting here as it has ABDAflot as its own national roster for gaming.
-
Nat replied to the topic Lanchester 6×4 AC in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
*Hopefully* when the Armies of book is released in July (armies of GB) they’ll put the v2 errata back in that fixed this!
Basically it looks like they copy and pasted the original v2 entries when they wrote the v3 rulebook, and so reverted a number of units (including the Lancaster armoured car) back to the original incorrect entries!
-
Nat replied to the topic Question on Dutch Tanks – One Turret or Two? in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
I’d go with two in a single turret as theres nothing to tell us to add a second turret.
-
Nat replied to the topic Closing Fire at an assault and running past enemy units in the forum Bolt Action 1 year ago
…. <dolt>… for some reason I had it that they were difficult terrain by RAW.. ooops!
- Load More
