Bob D

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 37 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #187488
    Bob D
    Participant

    That’s ok – no need to apologize!!!! Thanks very much for sharing what you do 🙂

    #187481
    Bob D
    Participant

    Hi Nat

    Ditto. From a non-Faecebook user – thanks for the info, and it is great to see some momentum for this great game and line of supporting models.

    However, I am not seeing the ‘better pic of the 2nd rate’ or those for the ‘modern’ merchants: is that just me (over a Safari browser)?

    I asked directly on the Hold Fast announcement page, but must have missed the time window within which Warlord respond. I heard that the Santa Ana is mentioned in the supplement: will there be a dedicated model for her (and her sisters) or do we need to use a generic Spanish 1st rate? Curious as we have two dedicated models for British 1st rates but only one for the Spanish, who had some lovely ships (including the highly prized 80-gun 3rd rates).

    Cheers

    —Bob

    • This reply was modified 2 years ago by Bob D.
    • This reply was modified 2 years ago by Bob D.
    • This reply was modified 2 years ago by Bob D.
    • This reply was modified 2 years ago by Bob D.
    #187129
    Bob D
    Participant

    Well, the Ottoman navy was not a smaller navy by any means: there were some quite large fleet battles against the Russians. My recollection was that the Russians used ‘normal’ ships, but heavily overgunned. The Turks, on the other hand, had quite different warships: wide with high sterns, thin skinned but consequently relatively fast, with huge crews but lighter and fewer guns than gun ports, being intended as much for transport as for fighting; and, at least in the early c18th, they used those high calibre but short ranged Kantar guns firing marble cannonballs: they definitely deserve a couple of their own ships!

    #187120
    Bob D
    Participant

    Hi Nat

     

    thanks for this. This sounds really good! I don’t have Faecebook so cannot see whatever has been posted there. Are there Ottoman ships as well? There should be as they were quite unique.

    cheers

    —Bob

    #182816
    Bob D
    Participant

    Thanks for the reply. That is really good to hear! It is good to know that Warlord have plans like this for BRS, once the COVID mess has finally been brought under control.

    Stay safe and well

    —Bob

    #178404
    Bob D
    Participant

    I do not see any Spanish bashing here. Nobody is bashing Spain because it is Spain, they are simply stating the historical record which was that, over the period of this game, the Spanish navy was a shadow of its former self and performed very poorly. I would add that this also applies to the domestic Army, but NOT to the colonial army which by all accounts performed well, e.g. during the US Revolutionary War and in defending their colonies against the Brits, e.g. in Argentina. Spain attempted to restore the fleet during the 1700s and built excellent ships, which were highly prized by the RN when they captured them; but their economic state and lack of sea time (hence experience and confidence) put them at a massive disadvantage even before a battle began. I think Ticio summarised this very simply and very well in the post at the bottom of page 1.

    The original poster was quite rightly, and through the use of evidence, querying the choice of Spanish admirals in Black Seas, pointing out the mis-spelling of the Santísima Trinidad, and querying the malus assigned to Spanish ships, leading to asking who would want to play them. That was answered further down by having bigger ships etc. and I will personally play the Spanish without hesitation. If I think the malus is unjustified in a particular (but likely rare) case I will not use it.

    Unfortunately, Fernando jumped in saying that the Spanish faction is unbalanced, and citing a completely ridiculous case as ‘evidence’. You joined the party by quoting a siege, which also does not prove anything beyond the fact that European troops serving in the tropics tended to be decimated by disease. If you think I am bashing Spain, I am truly not: I am just bashing you two 🙂 (And I mean that lightheartedly, so please smile).

    Nobody can doubt that Spain three centuries before was THE preeminent land and naval power due to superior training, innovation, leadership, experience and confidence; but, during the period covered by the game, the Spanish Navy (and domestic army) was in very poor state due precisely to the loss of those qualities

    Cheers

    —Bob

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 11 months ago by Bob D.
    • This reply was modified 3 years, 11 months ago by Bob D.
    #178393
    Bob D
    Participant

    @vetrarbreytin Sure Black Seas has islands, batteries and Martello towers. But it does not represent the land forces that did 99.9% of the fighting at Cartagena – you’d need Black Powder or some equivalent for that. But dude, if you fundamentally believe the Spanish are misrepresented in the Black Seas rules, simply adjust them to your taste and enjoy the game! That is, after all, the whole and only point 🙂

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 11 months ago by Bob D.
    #178390
    Bob D
    Participant

    That was a land engagement, a siege that failed primarily due to disease, and was outside the time window of Black Seas, which in any case is a naval game. While important, it was hardly “one of the greatest victories ever made in the Age of Sail history”: sieges in that period failed more often than not, especially in the Carib and the Americas; Spain repeatedly tried and failed to besiege Gibraltar during the 1700s, due to the fleet’s inability to seal it off from sea supply; and Nelson failed to take Tenerife in 1797. While I agree that the Spanish fleet should not be marginalized, the navy was struggling to catch up after the neglect of the 1600s. Spanish ships were very well built, and their crews undoubtedly fought honourably and courageously, but the battle fleet lacked the experience and tactical verve and aggression of their contemporary opponents. I think that is what the game is trying to represent.

    #178325
    Bob D
    Participant

    I’m sorry, but you are joking aren’t you? Yes it was economically a great win, but militarily not: I am sure you can easily replicate that victory (if you have enough ship models), given that the only British warships present (one first rate and two frigates) had already sailed away (with 8 of the merchantmen), so the fleet engaged by the Spanish only consisted of merchants (and Indiamen are just merchants, albeit powerful ones). It doesn’t sound like there was a battle anyway: just a few shots fired before the Brits realised they had no hope. Even if the 3 warships had stayed, the Spanish would win the game easily, with 31 ships of the line and 6 frigates, according to that article!!

    Don’t get me wrong, I am a big fan of the Spanish  – my wife is Ecuadorean, surname Fernández de Córdova, so you might guess her heritage 🙂 – and the Spanish did win their share of battles, but this is a very poor example!

    Saludos

    —Bob

     

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 11 months ago by Bob D.
    #178128
    Bob D
    Participant

    Brilliant job! I bought these same sets of planes with the idea of doing exactly the same thing, but never got around to it. Where did you find decals for the Nationalists? Painting circles is not a strong point…

    #175624
    Bob D
    Participant

    Given your point about being able to fire forward and high, maybe it should only be able to shoot at a plane in the forward arc that is at a higher level of advantage than the defiant…? A blanket fire forward does not seem right…

    #175612
    Bob D
    Participant

    Hi

    Yeah that is the way I play it too: no firepower at all in the forward arc

    Cheers

    —Bob

    #174167
    Bob D
    Participant

    Where is the news about this?

    I appreciate that every plane under the sun is available in 1/72, but I really hope that Warlord are not going to discontinue their line of aircraft as I really like them, and have no appetite to start building 1/72 planes for this system. In any case I would have thought going to a larger scale would lose that ‘mass’ effect, which is what drew me into the game in the first place.

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 2 months ago by Bob D.
    #174113
    Bob D
    Participant

    Yeah I am about to start as well, and have the same question!

    #172251
    Bob D
    Participant

    I agree with all of your points. I have WS&IM as well and like you saw that all of the big gun battles require 8+ SOL per side.

    I was looking at the Trafalgar OOB in the rule book and it looks very wrong. Indomptable was an 80-gun Tonnant class boat, I believe, not a 103-gunner; and the 80-gun French and Spanish SOL should be (rather good) 3rd Rates, not (rather inefficient) 2nd Rates. The four 1st Rates on the Allied side were all Spanish. But the Brits do have 2nd Rates in the form of the 98-gunners, which were used as secondary theatre flagships, so they are an important class and should have their own models. Ideally it would be nice to have models for the smaller 64 gunners, razees (as notes by the OP), small 6th Rate frigates, and large and small merchants, as noted above. I’d buy them anyway 🙂

    Cheers

    -Bob

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 37 total)