Mark

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #185745
    Mark
    Participant

    1. Closing fire counts as Hand to Hand against charges.Therefore, a result of six would see the Cavalry retire one full move and be disordered.

    Sorry, don’t have BP2, can’t answer the rest

     

    cheers

    #183122
    Mark
    Participant

    We really like the Black Powder system for our Napoleonics. As you have identified, the weakest part of the game is the way artillery is dealt with. This is a symptom of the wide span of history the rules cover, what may be good for War of Spanish Succession is not good for Napoleonics. Artillery was the most destructive arm a Napoleonic General  had at his disposal. You rightly identified one failing as being firepower, the other failing is frontage. A Company (Battery) of Napoleonic era artillery should be capable of defending a frontage equal to a three rank infantry battalion in line formation. This is a function it cannot do as written. We choose to model our batteries with a frontage equivalent  to an infantry unit in line. The number of actual gun models can be  adjusted to suit. We then broke down the main historical gun, howitzer, licorne by size/weight and assigned range brackets then number of dice for each range bracket, close/mid/long. Eg: 6pdr have  4/2/2. So, 4d6 at close, 2d6 at mid, 2 d6 at long, May look a bit odd to have mid and long the same number of dice, but remember Artillery over half range have a minus one modifier to hit rolls.

    Type,  #D6,  Range
    3-4pdr Gun/Howitzer                     3 / 2 / 1                  8 / 20 / 30
    6pdr Gun/5.5” Howitzer                 4 / 2 / 2                  12 / 24 / 40
    8-9pdr Gun/How, 10pdr Licorne  5 / 3 / 2                  15 / 30 / 50
    12pdr Gun/How, 20pdr Licorne    6 / 4 / 2                 20 / 40 / 60

    please see attachment

     

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 4 months ago by Mark.
    #168796
    Mark
    Participant

    One would have thought concerns over the quality of published work a Company produces would be taken seriously and improved for future releases. Not threaten customers who point out the failings. Cruel Seas deserved to be ridiculed for the mess it was. Though the rules are conceptually sound the execution was not. The amended rules book should have been given away free to those who supported the game and bought the flawed first printing.

    #163495
    Mark
    Participant

    One would think Warlord would be at least a bit embarrassed over the unprofessionalism of their publications by now. Though I don’t think anything could be as worse as Cruel Seas.

    #155953
    Mark
    Participant

    ignore

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 1 month ago by Mark.
    #155574
    Mark
    Participant

    Could anyone please point me to good online references for Soviet coastal craft and/or book references? My library lacks any reference unfortunately.

    cheers

    #155573
    Mark
    Participant

    cheers muchly

    #155237
    Mark
    Participant

    Looks great. The railing adds much to the look of the model.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)