Home brew theatre and doctrine cards

[Dreadpirate]

Renko, Please read again what you quoted above. It clearly says “I see” not “you see” or “Renko sees”. It was originally given in the context of acknowledging that we saw and interpreted the same thing in different ways.

I don’t expect you to necessarily agree with me, but what is the point of coming into a discussion about house rules, which by its very nature involves making changes to the rules, and repeatedly saying what is fairly summarized as “RAW, RAW, RAW” (rules as written)?

I’m not trying to chase you off. You share a lot of information that is valuable and interesting. I really appreciated what you posted about sustained dive and interlocking fire and upcoming releases.

I’m just asking you to play along with my wacky notions for house rules in a conversation about my wacky notions for house rules and discuss how to make them better aside from just not having any wacky notions at all.

I asked some questions way up top that I’d love to hear your opinion on if you care to share them about what would happen if you played deep pockets as a bonus. Would you be able to prevent a boom chit before you’ve taken it and would you discard deep pockets or remove it? You don’t have to agree with the necessity of my house rule at all to weigh in on that.

As for being passive/aggressive, well that’s the pot calling the kettle black. You seem to do that quite well yourself whenever I am cheeky enough to suggest deviating from the RAW in any way.

Go if you must or stay and join the conversation if you like.

• This reply was modified 4 years, 10 months ago by Dreadpirate.

[Author]

Posts