<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Warlord Games | Robert Scholtz | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community-members/roberts667/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community-members/roberts667/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Robert Scholtz.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:22:52 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3a523bed4377ba1b7109fb797f458203</guid>
				<title>Robert Scholtz replied to the topic Bolt Action 3rd Edition in the forum Bolt Action</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/bolt-action-3rd-edition/#post-189932</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 17:54:12 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they finally fix the Firing Smoke rules.</p>
<p>The opposing player should not be able to determine the landing point of a smoke round that does not land on target.  The landing point should be randomly determined using the &#8220;Miscalculation&#8221; effect in the Smoke Barrage Chart.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been playing Bolt Action since before the version 2 rules came&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-24825"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/bolt-action-3rd-edition/#post-189932" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8a03224286a2a5633135eb4d81a9aaa3</guid>
				<title>Robert Scholtz started the topic Do intervening infantry give soft cover to armor? in the forum Bolt Action</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/do-intervening-infantry-give-soft-cover-to-armor/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 12:10:41 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Situation:  I want to shoot my medium anti-tank gun at a tank that is out in the open. Next to the tank is an enemy infantry section that is between my anti-tank gun and the tank, so my shoot would pass through the infantry before hitting the tank.</p>
<p>Question:  Does the infantry section give the tank a -1 “Soft Cover” To Hit modifier?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cd4f1543c114a371dfefcb0cd13794ef</guid>
				<title>Robert Scholtz replied to the topic Warplane Type Chart on Reference Sheets do not match Official Bolt Action Errata in the forum Bolt Action</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/warplane-type-chart-on-reference-sheets-do-not-match-official-bolt-action-errata/#post-186402</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 20:57:24 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is how I read it also.</p>
<p>It just seems strange that I can&#8217;t find any Bolt Action 2.0 Reference Sheets online with the correct information listed on the Warplane Chart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3b915fd84ef26035215317a48edd03a5</guid>
				<title>Robert Scholtz started the topic Warplane Type Chart on Reference Sheets do not match Official Bolt Action Errata in the forum Bolt Action</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/warplane-type-chart-on-reference-sheets-do-not-match-official-bolt-action-errata/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:36:54 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The August 31, 2021 Bolt Action Rulebook – Errata states:</p>
<p><strong>“Page 86, Warplane Type Chart, Fighter-bomber.  </strong>The D6 Roll column text is wrong and should be 3 or 4 (rather than 2 or 4).<strong>”</strong></p>
<p>That would make the D6 Roll column of the chart read:</p>
<p>1 or 2 – Strafing fighter,</p>
<p>3 or 4 – Fighter-bomber,</p>
<p>5 or 6 – Ground-attack aircraft</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>All the quick re&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8334"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/warplane-type-chart-on-reference-sheets-do-not-match-official-bolt-action-errata/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">67f411fd247a61a250ebcf59b76ffb91</guid>
				<title>Robert Scholtz started the topic British National Characteristic Question in the forum Bolt Action</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/british-national-characteristic-question/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2021 17:54:46 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On page 18 of the Armies of Great Britain book the different National Characteristics a platoon may have are listed.  I have a question about the <strong>Up and at &#8217;em</strong> characteristic and the <strong>Blood curdling charge</strong> characteristic.  Below is the pertinent text from the book my question pertains to.</p>
<p><strong>Up and at &#8217;em: </strong> &#8220;If the army has this special rule then an&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8269"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/british-national-characteristic-question/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">42eef48bcd7f615c85e315ece0c5924e</guid>
				<title>Robert Scholtz changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/activity/p/8206/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2021 17:38:22 +0100</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dd6bf1990740900ff2392e042f7e3363</guid>
				<title>Robert Scholtz started the topic To what teams/sections does the British Paras Stubborn Rule apply? in the forum Bolt Action</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/to-what-teams-sections-does-the-british-paras-stubborn-rule-apply/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2021 17:31:17 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it correct that the British Paras Stubborn rule <strong>only applies to the Paratroop Infantry Sections</strong> in a unit?</p>
<p>It does not apply to the rest of the sections (officer, sniper, mortar team, etc.) in the unit even if they are paratroopers.  Only the paratroop infantry sections <strong>would not</strong> have to count pins when performing a moral test.  All the o&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8205"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/to-what-teams-sections-does-the-british-paras-stubborn-rule-apply/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">158eb115a52ef656caeee87f46f6fa8c</guid>
				<title>Robert Scholtz replied to the topic Bolt Action Player Finder (North America) in the forum Bolt Action</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/bolt-action-player-finder/page/5/#post-186249</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2021 01:59:11 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Location:  Manistee, Michigan</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">29361240f0d612bee86d2ea76c8a8ea7</guid>
				<title>Robert Scholtz started the topic Royal Navy Section in the forum Bolt Action</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/royal-navy-section/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2021 01:48:17 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which British units can have a Royal Navy Section attached to it?</p>
<p>Also, what is the cost for each member of the section?  Are they the same as other infantry sections (13 pts for Veteran, 10 pts for Regular, and 8 pts for Inexperienced) or are they limited as to what experience level they can be assigned (ex. Airborne sections are Veteran&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8180"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/royal-navy-section/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">840455b803aee8025448f87ec71e050d</guid>
				<title>Robert Scholtz became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/activity/p/8163/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2021 09:14:47 +0100</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>