Jim Ripley

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 111 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #191907
    Jim Ripley
    Participant

    I tried that block of figures and didn’t like it . Also tried the 6 man metal seated troop set . They are more scale but their feet made it difficult to jam them in . . Looking at pictures there wasn’t much room in the 251 , you were pretty much shoulder to shoulder and how you fit with canteen , bread bag , etc making you wider at the hips I have no idea . Most pictures of 10 – 12 men in the back are training or parade type occasions . Combat photos show 7 – 8 guys in the back . I managed to get 4 of the old early troops in with a couple kit bashed to jumping over the sides as was their habit to get out in a hurry , that rear door is a pia to get through fast . I have 3 running troops on single bases to portray guys who used the door . I really didn’t go to crazy on the door hinges as they are complicated and I couldn’t be bothered .

    The pair of 251s has the seated truck passengers added sitting on the compartment sides , This way I was abel to add 7 to one track and 8 to the other , plus machine gunner , and yes there are driver figures crammed in their . I used somewhat smaller resin figures with feet cut off and helmets sanded down . These are part of a convoy of half doven vehicles , with a troop carrier Blitz  , cargo Blitz and a couple of 250s , radio vehicle and the 20mm turret .

    #191905
    Jim Ripley
    Participant

    I think if WG had scaled their troops to actual 28mm scale ( what ever that is ) , and made the vehicles the same , we might be better off . I have 3 of the plastic Bedford troop carrier trucks for which WG gives you 10 seated troops for the rear . I managed to fit in 12 by removing the center row of seats ( 6 each side ) . IRC the truck is supposed to carry about 24 troops back there , if you leave the  center row of seats in , you can’t fit any of the seated plastics without a lot of surgery .

    Sorry for the tangent .  Now anyone want to comment on how the commanders from the WG plastic Pzr III , IV , V , VI & Tiger II are all different sizes , one being about 1/64th scale  to another being larger than my Tamiya 1/48 . I wish they would at least settle on one size for all tank crews . Due to having multiples of tanks and wanting crews in the hatches I have had to go to other  figure companies for crews

    #191902
    Jim Ripley
    Participant

    It has always been obvious to me that the Warlord guys who think up the rule sets , are gamer / painters  1st and foremost and probably have no real interest in real life WW2 vehicles . Some of the weird stuff they put in the rules just makes me shake my head . It’s supposed to be just a game though …. .

    The rear benches were really just padded covers for a floor mounted storage bin . The ones in front being about a foot longer than the rear pair . There was a open top  stowage bin behind each seat back and the wall . Note , there was specific plan on what  equipment ( ammo boxes , spare mg barrels , etc ) went where, depending on the sub version of the 251 . You would have different stuff if it was a plain jane  troop carrier or say an 251/7 engineer vehicle with 1600 pounds of mines and compressors / generator taking up the re rear bench seat area ( crew of 8 ) . The Stuka Zu Fuss pictures I have show the rockets stacked inside in their wooden firing crates a stack of 6 ( 2 rows of 3 ) across the front pair of benches . There is enough room for the commander to stand between them and the cab roof . In the rear sit 4 guys on the rear  benches . So that would give the vehicle 2 salvos ( 1 on the frame & 1 reload inside ) .

    A little of topic , sorry … any way I tend to lean to the real life side of things in WW2 gaming so ,  these vehicles are not transport. You and your gaming buds can do what you like .   I’ve been building Warlord plastic tanks since the 1st T-34/85 came out and still haven’t played a game

    #191898
    Jim Ripley
    Participant

    Here’s a picture of a C chassis . 1. Driver .  2. Gunner   3. Loader   4. Commander   X. 3-4 guys crammed in .  Y. 2-3 guys on top of ammo storage . Not really something you would want to be in advancing under fire , plus the gun couldn’t fire . If you had to bug out PDQ , uncomfy but your haulin ass out of trouble

     

    #191895
    Jim Ripley
    Participant

    Looking at internal pictures of the 251/9 I would say they could cram 6 – 7 guys to the rear of the gun . The crew of the /9 would be  3-4 ( driver , gunner . loader /commander ) , and they could stand either side of the gun mount . It’s pretty tight in there and I don’t think you would be able to have too much personal gear on because of the space taken up by the crews gear . BUT if you had to retreat somewhere fast , you would make do , riding on the hood if you had to.  But calling it a transport is really pushing it IMO . But then who said that the Bolt Action rules & stats all make sense in the real world

    #191884
    Jim Ripley
    Participant

    I have so many prone Soviet figures ., I gave a bunch away . I think I’ve built 8 boxes of the original troops and 4 of the winter box , and 2 of the new guys .  You can only so many guys with a rifle , light MG or anti tank rifle . I borrowed panzerfaust and binocular arm pairs from my German parts box  which fit with a little sanding . Plus I’ve done some leg swaps  from other Russians so it looks like the soldier is diving to the ground . I’ve also cut and adjusted  the torso so it sits a little higher off the ground for a couple of guys throwing grenades . . I used the Japanese prone figure as a dead guy on his back which took a bit of work adding the details not included on a figure who is laying down . I used the extra small Russian rifle ammo pouches to sub for the Japanese kit  , and then green stuff cross straps and belt .  A couple of the Soviets in the quilted uniforms  ( I hate those molded on packs and bed rolls ) can be fitted with the capes from the new box . If you trim the back pack off , the cape covers the mess you make . And the running guy can be depicted climbing a ladder or into the back of a truck if you give him the right arms and twist the feet a little .

     

    #191876
    Jim Ripley
    Participant

    I feel your pain in having to have more then one of a tank or gun . I too am afflicted with that malady . I tend to build more then one of something because there is such a variety of source material in the form of pictures , never mind a lot of kit fought in Asia , Africa , the Russian Steppe and Europe , so different paint schemes , crew uniforms , ground cover  etc .   Here’s a couple of examples : PSC 28mm  Soviet 47mm Anti tank gun . I have 12 IRC , maybe 14 . Got the first 2 on sale years age . Loved it was plastic and was easy to kit bash . I have whitewashed guns on winter bases , I have a couple with closed trail legs in tow order and I even built one knocked out , that way I able to use some metal casualty figures

    The WG plastic Pak 40 is awesome , will be getting one for my FJ troops . The new Brit 6 pounder is great as well . Just figuring out the crew and have ordered another one to base inside a building ruin .

    I did add a few gun tools as that’s what my sources showed . Hopefully the next plastic gun will be the ZIS 3 , I do have 4 already , 2 WG metal & 2- 3D print , but who wouldn’t want more ?

     

    • This reply was modified 4 weeks ago by Jim Ripley.
    #191871
    Jim Ripley
    Participant

    Just received the new British plastic 6 pounder and Heavy Weapons platoon , they shipped early , well done Warlord . The figures are a little smaller in height ( maybe 1-2 mm ) than the new Brit box , pretty much on par with the original 5 man plastic sprue . I always thought the 5 man sprue looked a little off , with 3 of the figures having skinny legs compared to the other 2 . This new sprue has fixed that IMO , they look “right ” , if you know what I mean .  I test fit some of the one piece weapon arm pairs from the new Brits , Commandos & Airbourne that I had in the parts box and they fit the shoulders of the new figures easily , no filing needed .

    I’ll get around to  building them this weekend as I am converting 8th Army prone bodies into European theatre troops by giving them long pant legs from some of the old original Brit plastics .

    Only negative on the new kits : they both could use loose ammo boxes . You get 2 per mortar , 1 on the ground , 1 being carried . The Vickers has the same , 1 with a belt and 1 carried . Not enough in my opinion . The 6 pounder gives you 2  closed metal boxes , would like to have seen a few more plus one molded with an open lid . Hopefully one of those 3D print aftermarket guys will fill the gap . I have got some 1/56 German ammo , 75mm Pak and 88mm Flak  sets in resin from Frontline Games , maybe they’ll branch out into Allied ammo

    #191829
    Jim Ripley
    Participant

    I pre ordered both the Pak 40 & the Heavy Weapons box . A little pricey for what you get but nice models . Nice having ammo boxes for the weapons as well as both left and right hands carrying them included .  Having both boxes  , I ended up with 16 crew figures ( 4 sprues of 4 ) , by adding extra troops from the parts box I was able to make a 5 man crew for the Pak and 3 man crews for all 4 MGs , both mortars and both Panzerschrecks .Still have lots of arms left over to sort into the parts box . Hopefully both the crew & weapons  sprues will be available during the next half price sprue sale . My only negative comment is that the Panzerschreck loader has the round in his left hand , making it weird to load the weapon if he’s kneeling behind the gunner , which in pictures he usually is .  I sometimes wonder if the guys designing these actually look at period photos to see how things were done . And don’t get me started on machine gun ammo cans and artillery ammo boxes that look nothing like the real thing . Thank goodness for 3D printers

     

    • This reply was modified 2 months, 1 week ago by Jim Ripley.
    #191810
    Jim Ripley
    Participant

    Just picked up the newish Warlord resin Winter British Vickers MG & a 3 inch mortar . The figures , while nicely sculpted are on the small side . I even added a camo mesh  covered plastic helmet to a figure by just gluing it on top of molded helmet , another bare head figure got a plastic helmet as well . While basing the 3 man mortar crew I wanted to add a 4th figure , the new Brit/Canadian plastics are too big , so I dug out one of the original plastic Brits ( 5 figure sprue ) , he also is bigger than the resin guys but not as bad as the B/C guys  so he’ll have to do . And don’t get me started on the Vickers loader , sitting there like he’s seated in a car , holding an ammo belt , not kneeling beside the gunner , feeding a belt from an ammo box . Come on Warlord , let’s try to make things look realistic

    Attachments:
    #191735
    Jim Ripley
    Participant

    I often ask myself that question as 2 of the 3 I built are mine . I ended up building one with a bunch of FJ tank riders  and built the other as knocked out . Still haven’t figured out how to replicate the rear casement doors open , so just tacked the panel in place , might get around to it one day . Missing small parts are probably just a symptom of someone not caring and yanking the sprues out of the mold . Its the partial molded pieces which is the real PIA . I’ve probably built over 100 Warlord plastic vehicles and except for the missing Jagdtiger bow guns I’ve only had one Stalin tank with a small “bite” out of the lower hull tub . Easy enough to fix as the road  wheels and suspension arms are a full side piece which covered it up . We won’t go into the problems that show up on some of the Resin vehicles here …..

    #191727
    Jim Ripley
    Participant

    Sorry Lee , that rifle  is part 34 and has a bayonet folded against the barrel, not part 36 . Its got to be a short shot or a really tight mold gate which snaps the part off , as I’ve had 7 sprues with the same problem . There are 2 other rifles with extended bayonet per sprue so if you have platoon box you could figure it out with a little surgery and super glue . And speaking of missing parts , I’ve built 3 of the Warlord plastic Jagdtigers , all were missing the bow machine . Nothing in the sealed bags so it broke on when the plastic came out of the mold I guess . Lucky I have a deep parts box with spares from WG & Rubicon kits . Still bloody annoying though

    • This reply was modified 5 months, 3 weeks ago by Jim Ripley.
    #191722
    Jim Ripley
    Participant

    Well it seems to be a QC problem , as a sprue I’ve just received from a online seller  ( 4 months after I got my 1st box ) is also missing the bayonet on the same part . Come on Warlord , sort it out

    #191644
    Jim Ripley
    Participant

    That would work , I just didn’t feel like messing around that much when the Warlord plastics were easier arm swaps , just remember to have the same cuff on both arms .

    #191642
    Jim Ripley
    Participant

    I wasn’t that keen on the Victrix Germans when I got them . Very nice detail , loved the heavy weapons sprue , and although you could have 3 or 4 arm versions per body , you couldn’t use all the arms on all 10 body styles , at least that’s the way it seemed to me . So I passed the kit off to one of my fiends , who’s quite happy with it . To each there own I guess . I’ll stick to the Warlord plastics for my kit bashing , although I do have some RKX files to have printed of multi part late war Germans and Canadians , I’m hoping the bodies and arms are compatible with my plastics

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 111 total)