<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Warlord Games | G Scase | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community-members/bachgendrwg/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community-members/bachgendrwg/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for G Scase.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 09:45:40 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">58119cde49e540054d8cf1fb7bf1f871</guid>
				<title>G Scase replied to the topic Supports in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/supports/#post-188427</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2022 12:30:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers Big Al</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I am happy with the answer given. Incidentally, in P&amp; S the supports don&#8217;t move with the fighting unit but the difference is that the P&amp;S rules spell that out for you making it perfectly clear whereas the BP rules don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">038b0c2df18633bd8a54fb0523f09dc1</guid>
				<title>G Scase replied to the topic Supports in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/supports/#post-188423</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2022 20:48:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9dc37c8380c5b9738674603dc4d857f0</guid>
				<title>G Scase started the topic Supports in the forum Black Powder</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/supports/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2022 11:56:02 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just getting back to BP2 after a long break. Just want to recheck a couple of things re supports (much clearer in the Pike and Shotte Rules by the way).</p>
<p>a) Our club has believed for years that you can issue one brigade order that says Unit A to charge and units B and C to support. Is that correct or do you need a separate order for supports&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-16316"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/supports/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bcb24cdad0850b3b2d37b445905d3747</guid>
				<title>G Scase replied to the topic Help ! Has our club being playing this wrong for over 10 years? in the forum Hail Caesar</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/help-has-our-club-being-playing-this-wrong-for-over-10-years/#post-186392</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:47:12 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks for clearing those points up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">01ee0591576bb21f6ed48ea51f93d669</guid>
				<title>G Scase started the topic Help ! Has our club being playing this wrong for over 10 years? in the forum Hail Caesar</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/help-has-our-club-being-playing-this-wrong-for-over-10-years/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:33:39 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take 4 contiguous units charging 4 enemy contiguous units :-</p>
<p>a) we&#8217;ve treated them as 4 individual combats not one engagement. Each combat worked out, through to follow ups and advances, before moving on to the next. e.g. If the left hand unit wins and drives its opponent back then they can follow up regardless of the fact that it&#8217;s in a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8324"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/help-has-our-club-being-playing-this-wrong-for-over-10-years/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a67dacd190b1f77f2666108b4415d8af</guid>
				<title>G Scase started the topic WARS OF THE ROSES in the forum Hail Caesar</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/wars-of-the-roses/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2020 13:49:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The free ruleset in Wargames Illustrated recently got me thinking why I don&#8217;t use my 15mm WoR armies very often. I had to admit that Hail Caesar doesn&#8217;t give the right historical feel to those battles. I decided to try and solve the problem, and I feel I&#8217;ve been successful. A while ago I picked up (from this forum) the suggested stats. They&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5317"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/wars-of-the-roses/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>