Proof reading

This topic has 5 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 6 months ago by Chimpy.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

Author

Posts
November 8, 2020 at 4:46 pm #182813

Rich
Participant

Hi all,

Really tempted to try VAS but I hate errata (it’s a thing for me…)
I was put off CS by the 10 pages of errata – is the proof reading any better for VAS?

November 8, 2020 at 5:44 pm #182814

Enioch
Participant

Well, for one thing, Königsberg is a Battleship (apparently) :-), and I’m pretty sure some DDs are missing their ASW suites. I don’t think we’ve had any official errata out yet, too (by all means, correct me if I’m wrong).

November 9, 2020 at 7:56 pm #182839

Lord Snotrag
Participant

Scharnhorst as a cruiser is also kinda pushing it. The rulebook comes out in January with what I hope will be up to date ship lists and stats. I’ll kinda play it by ear until then.

November 10, 2020 at 11:02 am #182847

Nat
Participant

Currently there is no erata… as already mentioned the rulebook hasnt been released (due end of Jan) so all we have is a Quick Start Rule booklet….

There has been feed back to warlord about typos in the cards, but the cards will just be player aids and (hopefully) over ruled by the mainbook

November 12, 2020 at 8:15 pm #182965

Rich
Participant

OK – thanks all. I’ll hold on for a bit and check the forum!

November 18, 2020 at 8:11 pm #183066

Chimpy
Participant

On the model of the Scharnhorst it’s described as a Battleship on the base. Maybe the cruiser designation on the card is used for something else in the main rules but it’s probably a typo.
Author

Posts

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.