<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Warlord Games | Richard Coates | Mentions</title>
	<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community-members/richard/activity/mentions/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community-members/richard/activity/mentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed mentioning Richard Coates.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:45:40 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a6385611df3291a32d0be3e36c16911f</guid>
				<title>Stuart Harrison replied to the topic Supplemental Books &#038; New Equipment vs Tournaments in the forum Bolt Action</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/supplemental-books-new-equipment-vs-tournaments/#post-187853</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2022 00:52:21 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://www.warlordgames.com/community-members/richard/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Richard</a>.</p>
<p>Re: &#8221; If they are not designed for tournaments, why are they still being produced? I am really tired of seeing something new and then being told it will upset play balance or create some other issue. Either allow new things to be used or stop creating them.&#8221;</p>
<p>You appear to have the polar opposite take on Theatre and Campaign books to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-14415"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/supplemental-books-new-equipment-vs-tournaments/#post-187853" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">139e464e2c35bf19261c4ab64abead36</guid>
				<title>Nat replied to the topic Dug In confusion in the forum Bolt Action</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/dug-in-confusion/#post-177035</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:10:44 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://www.warlordgames.com/community-members/richard/' rel="nofollow ugc">@richard</a> &#8211; you mean almost realistic?  just a head and weapon showing whilst firing!&#8230; although I would have balanced it with the negative of the unit gaining the FIXED rule whilst in a &#8216;dug in&#8217; position</p>
<p>Flamethrowers (preferably on a tank!) and /or smoke seems to be the way to deal with dug in troops</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>