<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Warlord Games | Antonio | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community-members/antonio-dellerba/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community-members/antonio-dellerba/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Antonio.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 22:55:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2c8db04b2b02bbbfa627bcc2562fd90f</guid>
				<title>Antonio replied to the topic Western Desert: Commonwealth Armies in the forum Bolt Action</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/western-desert-commonwealth-armies/#post-189181</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 17:28:44 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the doubt came to me for these two examples shown in the FAQ</p>
<p><em>When building a force from the Western Desert book, British </em><br />
<em>and Commonwealth armies get the basic traits from the AoGB </em><br />
<em>book (i.e. the free artillery observer in lists that allow them, and </em><br />
<em>the barrage reroll) and then the National Characteristics from the </em><br />
<em>Western Desert.</em><br />
<em>Example 1: A&hellip;</em><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-23931"><a href="https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/western-desert-commonwealth-armies/#post-189181" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c9126ac32dc2c2efc70370e435503205</guid>
				<title>Antonio started the topic Western Desert: Commonwealth Armies in the forum Bolt Action</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/western-desert-commonwealth-armies/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 16:20:58 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all</p>
<p>Pag. 112, if I build a New Zelander platoon and choose NOT to use the national characteristic p. 18 of the Armies of Great Britain, do I replace it with ALL four New Zelander national rules? (not one of your choice, but all four).</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a1a2a3ab2d01ab7b5fd5c63f6321ba38</guid>
				<title>Antonio replied to the topic Forward observer Naval in the forum Bolt Action</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/forward-observer-naval/#post-187022</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2022 13:26:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Nat</p>
<p>But, there there is no difference between the two and also in easyarmy the naval of the soft underbelly book is valued 150 points. All this makes me think of an error in the valorization within the book soft underbelly</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8af54bc8e7552fcb2edf5a55fcec0da1</guid>
				<title>Antonio started the topic Forward observer Naval in the forum Bolt Action</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/forward-observer-naval/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2022 12:49:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all</p>
<p>Italy soft underbelly pag.163<br />
180 pts regular</p>
<p>D-day Overlord pag. 266<br />
150 pts regular</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the correct one?</p>
<p>Ty</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3cb7338db17270bb9f1c1217ffbd6933</guid>
				<title>Antonio replied to the topic Italian rules: NO RUN! in the forum Bolt Action</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/italian-rules-no-run/#post-186068</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2021 15:08:36 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank all.</p>
<p>First rule: always look in the FAQ &#8230; thanks Stuart &#x1f643;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d14adc269e3f77bd628a40b66155b9f7</guid>
				<title>Antonio started the topic Italian rules: NO RUN! in the forum Bolt Action</title>
				<link>https://www.warlordgames.com/community/topic/italian-rules-no-run/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2021 10:30:52 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all</p>
<p>the Italian rule says that the opponent cannot run in the first round, but if in the first wave there was a piece of artillery, is it logical that this cannot enter?  This can be in contrast with the fact that in the first wave, everything must enter?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Antonio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>