• Home
  • Webstore
  • News Archive
  • Events Calendar
  • Contact Us
  • Forum
Warlord Games Statement
Back to homepage

Advanced search
  • Board index ‹ Pike & Shotte ‹ Pike & Shotte Army Lists, Scenarios & Battle Reports
  • Change font size
  • Print view
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

2nd Test

Post a reply
Previous topic • Next topic • 11 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2

2nd Test

Postby Mike Target » Wed May 02, 2012 1:16 pm

Following on from Reds report the RGMB put on its second game of Pike and Shotte: Myself and Fazey commanding the Parliamentarians, Rob and Michael going all Swedish, Rick and Red, our resident royalists being unable to attend.


With both our Royalist players bowing out it was left to the Swedes and Roundheads to put Pike and Shotte through its first game at the RGMB.

Sides were roughly even and quite sizable, and astonishingly almost entirely painted! Only 12 dismounted dragoons and a gun disgraced the table!

For Parliament! 4 brigades:
The Earl of Essex (general) commanding Lifeguard, Saker and Storming Party.
Cromwell commanding 2 squadrons of Ironsides, 1 of Dragoons, and 2 units of commanded Shotte.
Earl James commanding 3 regiments of foot, 1 saker, 1 squadron of Horse.
Thomas Black commanding ditto.

For Sweden! 3 Brigades:
Gustav Adolphus with 2 regiments of Horse.
Benny with 2 regiments of Elite foot , a falcon and 2 squadrons of Horse.
Bjorn with 2 regiments of Elite Foot, one regiment of elite Foot Guards, 2 sakers and a falcon.

Parliament had the advantage of numbers, though not by as much as you might think: the difference was mostly skirmishers. By contrast the smaller Swedish army was very much an elite fighting force.

An 8-6 table was laid out, and battle commenced using a random arrival system to simulate a meeting engagement, where commanders couldnt be quite sure what was available untill it arrived and where it would actually be. The battlefield was mostly open field with a cluster of houses and farmland at one end. The game began with Essex's Vanguard opposing Bennys much larger brigade.

The battle got off to a slow start, so slow it was commented on by passers by, but this was simply a symptom of the scenario and the table size, rather than being bundled into a fight haphazard each brigade was able to come on in good order and find itself a good position miles from the nearest enemy..., a smaller table (perhaps 8 by 4) would have got things going faster. As it was nothing happened for a while as both sides brought in their reserves and deployed them in a leisurely manner, and only a small amount of skirmishing and long range potshots took place before both armies were present. The slow pace wasnt helped by some very average order rolls: even using the unmodified order test as per the book our brigades were only creeping forward at one move a turn!

Eventually the dragoons opened the ball, advancing before the Parliamentarian left at the head of Cromwells brigade and giving fire to try and sting the Swedes into a rash charge. Unfortunatly, not being led by Rupert, they declined and returned it with interest eventually forcing the dragoons to retire. A quick check of the rules showed that Swedish musketeers are better than their English opponents and the English were getting the worst of the firefight! Cromwell and Essex decided to try and close to melee where the odds are a bit more even, but this was stalled by a flurry of failed order rolls, and the English had to weather another round of fire.

On Parliaments right the battle never really started, with several regiments of foot, skirmishers and guns from each side heading slowly into the urban area to contest it, however they never really came to blows.

Back on the left the English army finally got moving again launching their cavalry at the Swedish musketeers, one manged to Hedgehog, and the Ironsides drew up, but there was a moment of panic when one failed its test and was caught in the open by Cromwells finest. Panic turned to relief as the Ironsides fluffed their dice and fled the field!

Seeing an opportunity to send the whole English left into to disarray Gustav Adolphus shouted "follow me!" and made a beeline for Essex and his Cuirassiers. Much jest has been made of the inferiority of Parliaments caracoling cavalry but Gustav wasnt laughing when the Cuirassiers forced him back, and moments later answered with a charge of their own! This minor victory was a signal to the rest of the English forces to surge forward and try and overthrow the Swedish right, with the remaining Ironsides charging the disordered Hedgehog, and Foot regiments from both sides getting stuck into a proper push of pike. The Swedish line held, but only just. Most of their right hand units were thoroughly battered and might not have stood if the pressure was kept up. Alas we shall never know, for we were out of time.

As I said wasnt perhaps the right time or table for this scenario: it probably needs a smaller table (or bigger move rates!), and we should have gone for a simpler stand up fight for our first game with these rules.

We did manage to get quite a few things tried out like hedgehogs and dragoons, though we still havnt had chance to smash a cavalry unit into a freshly formed and untouched hedgehog to see what happens!
Caracoling doesnt seem to be hugely disadvantageous, I suspect that Parliamentarian Horse will need to be either concealed or used aggressively to make sure no cavaliers get the jump on them. Quite pleased with the dragoons too, and the limited number of firelocks in the army. Just good enough to make a difference that you wont want to waste them.
Artillery seems to have struck the nice balance between low reliability and massive destruction...we even had a saker blow itself up!
The debate over formations goes on: Parliament initially had its units drawn up in the dutch fashion but started to switch to a more swedish style as the game went on and more flexibility was needed. I also adopted the ECW tactic of mixing your brigades into combined arms formations: all the Horse with a little bit of Foot and the Foot with a little bit of Horse. Thats why each foot brigade has a single squadron of Horse, and Cromwells Horse had two units of firelocks. In theory the formation becomes more flexible and more robust: Basically its like playing Rock,Paper, Scissors with two hands, and effectivly turns each brigade into a small army in its own right. Whether it will work remains to be seen though!


Lighting at the RGMBs club rooms is pretty awful and of 40 pictures taken only a handful are of any use.

View from the English left where the Swedes have gotten themselves into a bit of a muddle, but being elite they sorted themselves out...
Image
The swedish left and centre begins its advance.
Image
The English Right and Centre.
Image
The English centre: Essex and the vanguard.
Image
Michael (right) and "General in training" Rob discussing strategy. Behind them, the rest of the RGMB.
Image

Next tuesday we intend to try again, possibly with more royalists and with a simpler scenario!
Mike Target
Centurion
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 5:09 pm
Top

Re: 2nd Test

Postby sandman36 » Wed May 02, 2012 3:55 pm

Great looking armies and table. It sounds like an interesting game. Lots of back and forth and changing of fortune. Just the way I like it.
Dulce et Decorum est pro patria mori
(Sweet and fitting it is to die for the father land)
Please visit my hobby blog at: http://ahunt-dulceetdecorum.blogspot.com/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iC65ufGU ... e=youtu.be
User avatar
sandman36
Legionary
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:10 pm
Location: Colorado, USA
  • Website
Top

Re: 2nd Test

Postby Jammers » Wed May 02, 2012 4:03 pm

Nice report chap. How many points were you playing to?
.. I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live, as the greatest he; ... and I do think that the poorest man in England is not bound in a strict sense to that government that he hath not had a voice to put himself under
Jammers
Tribune
 
Posts: 748
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 7:11 am
Top

Re: 2nd Test

Postby Mike Target » Wed May 02, 2012 5:39 pm

Points? What are points?

No point in pointing, fair point?

:lol:
Mike Target
Centurion
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 5:09 pm
Top

Re: 2nd Test

Postby Jammers » Wed May 02, 2012 5:40 pm

Mike Target wrote:Points? What are points?

No point in pointing, fair point?

:lol:



Ahh - you bung figures on and stop when you think you have enough on the table. Good work :D
.. I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live, as the greatest he; ... and I do think that the poorest man in England is not bound in a strict sense to that government that he hath not had a voice to put himself under
Jammers
Tribune
 
Posts: 748
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 7:11 am
Top

Re: 2nd Test

Postby Mike Target » Wed May 02, 2012 10:58 pm

Not even as complicated as that.

We just put every figure we have on the table.

In this case it was a relatively small game with only half the clubs ECW armies being available.

A quick count up of the regiments is made: if one side appears to have significantly more than the other the scenario is usually tweaked to compensate, but not always: Sometimes you just have to fight the odds too.
Mike Target
Centurion
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 5:09 pm
Top

Re: 2nd Test

Postby red » Thu May 03, 2012 12:05 am

Rick limited himself to reserves in the first test, which wound up as 2 regiments of foote and a cannon, and I make it 2 5ths of the clubs armies with myself, Rick and Luke being absent.
Night shifts, it's almost as bad as being married. :P
User avatar
red
Legionary
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:30 am
Top

Re: 2nd Test

Postby trevor allen » Tue May 08, 2012 7:02 pm

I'll play you at that scenario Jammers! Your 600 pts V my 3-4000 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Trev
trevor allen
Legionary
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 2:33 pm
Top

Re: 2nd Test

Postby Jammers » Tue May 08, 2012 7:37 pm

trevor allen wrote:I'll play you at that scenario Jammers! Your 600 pts V my 3-4000 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Trev


You may even win for a change :D
.. I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live, as the greatest he; ... and I do think that the poorest man in England is not bound in a strict sense to that government that he hath not had a voice to put himself under
Jammers
Tribune
 
Posts: 748
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 7:11 am
Top

Re: 2nd Test

Postby ady2650 » Fri May 11, 2012 11:33 am

Jammers wrote:
trevor allen wrote:I'll play you at that scenario Jammers! Your 600 pts V my 3-4000 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Trev


You may even win for a change :D

:lol: :lol: :lol:
"Stand aside evil wrong doers, I am about the Queens business"
ady2650
Aquilifer
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 5:37 pm
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire, England
Top

Next

Post a reply
11 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2

Return to Pike & Shotte Army Lists, Scenarios & Battle Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group