<snip>Its the interdependence between pike and shotte that needs to be represented - pike protecting shotte from cavalry and/or other pike and shotte protecting pike form shotte - that is the cornerstone of the warfare of the period.I am making these comments in the contexts of the English Civil Wars and not the Thirty Years War and my use of the term "semi-fictitious" was unfortunate with hindsight; but I'm not persuaded of the justification for having separate pike units and shot units as the basis for any army that took part in the civil wars in England - or Scotland for that matter. Like Mikeland, my own armies - Covenanter and Scots Royalist - are for collecting only. I would love to find a set of rules that would lead me to take up gaming again. It would be great if those rules were the Black Powder supplement. I think what Warlord has done for my favourite period has been brilliant.
) I'd like to muse further on this very interesting topic.I totally agree that you want the rules to represent that interdependency between pike and shot, with their strengths and weaknesses - it is part of the 'colour' of this period. The contemporary drill manuals explain how officers are to drill the pike and shot in bodies, and also in combined formations (e.g. "batalia").At the same time surely the rules need to allow commanders to act and react as they did in actual engagements, and to me this often meant shot, and sometimes pike acting (semi) independently. For example the Battle of Ripple Field where we are given the impression it was a horse, dragoon and shot only engagement. Who wouldn't want to be able to lead forward Appleyard's musketeers to take Cheriton Wood from Leighton's musketeers at the Battle of Cheriton. Then, most famously, surely every Royalist worth his salt would want to be in the body of Cornish pike led by Sir Bevil Grenville assualting Landsdown Hill.Now all of these foot troops came from pike and shot regiments, but on their fateful days, their commanders chose to deploy them as bodies of shot, or pike during the battle. In Clarendon's account of Landsdown Sir BG details the shot from his regiment to cover his left where the ground was hedged, his horse on to cover his right where it was open, while he then joins at the head of his pike formation (as any gentlemen should!) and leads the assault which led to his death but Royalist victory (hoorah!).Return to Pike & Shotte General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest