grant wrote:Ah! Well be sure to tell him that his 15mm Germans were exquisite. I couldn't believe how nicely they fit together.
I'm sure I ordered from Chilter at some point too.
^^ the Russians too!
grant wrote:Ah! Well be sure to tell him that his 15mm Germans were exquisite. I couldn't believe how nicely they fit together.
I'm sure I ordered from Chilter at some point too.
Eumerin wrote:
The "browbeating" (and the term shouldn't be taken entirely seriously, although I do think some of the people involved are a bit heavy handed) that I typically see on the Dakka forums whenever someone shows interest in FoW typically involves pushing them toward PSC. I used to see some Peter Pig, but even that's fallen by the wayside. Other manufacturers never get mentioned at all.
Parus Ater wrote:Eumerin wrote:
The "browbeating" (and the term shouldn't be taken entirely seriously, although I do think some of the people involved are a bit heavy handed) that I typically see on the Dakka forums whenever someone shows interest in FoW typically involves pushing them toward PSC. I used to see some Peter Pig, but even that's fallen by the wayside. Other manufacturers never get mentioned at all.
Thing is, when you recommend a range it has to be for a reason. PP has much better looking models than BF, it's not hard but PP's are very nice. FIB is cheaper and nicer than BF to a degree but not everyone liked the bases on the tanks.
PSC are both cheaper and nicer looking, not as nice as PP but much nicer than BF and much cheaper but you get the benefit of the company clearly hammering along to make as complete a range as they can so you know that whatever you fancy you can get one that matches in style and scale.
Parus Ater wrote:But you must admit that the mainstream prospective player will want models PSC can provide, and if they're better looking and a literal fraction of the price then pointing them towards PSC is a prime quality bit of advice.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Undave and 4 guests